Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evangelicals and Israel: Theological roots of a political alliance
Christian Century ^ | 11/4/98 | Donald Wagner

Posted on 02/02/2002 4:22:03 AM PST by veronica

When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited Washington this past January, his initial meeting was not with President Clinton but with Jerry Falwell and more than 1,000 fundamentalist Christians.

The crowd saluted the prime minister as "the Ronald Reagan of Israel," and Falwell pledged to contact more than 200,000 evangelical pastors, asking them to "tell President Clinton to refrain from putting pressure on Israel" to comply with the Oslo accords.

The meeting between Netanyahu and Falwell illustrates a remarkable political and theological convergence.

The link between Israel's Likud government and the U.S. Religious Right was established by Natanyahu's mentor, Menachem Begin, during the Carter and Reagan administrations. However, the roots of evangelical support for Israel lie in the long tradition of Christian thinking about the millennium.

In Luke's account of the ascension, the disciples ask Jesus, "Lord, is this the time when you will restore the Kingdom to Israel?" The question illustrates the early church's fascination with Israel and its prophetic role at the end of history--a fascination that continues to this day. Reflections on the end times draw on the Book of Daniel, Zechariah 9-14, Ezekiel 38-39 and various apocryphal books, as well as Matthew 24, the early Pauline letters (1 Thess. 4:16-17; 5:1-11) and the Book of Revelation.

An early version of Christian eschatology, called "historic premillennialism," held that Jesus would return and establish his millennial kingdom after the world had been evangelized. However, by the 18th century another model of eschatology emerged in England that emphasized the role of a reconstituted Israel in the end times.

This eschatology was rooted in three streams of British Christianity: the piety of English Puritanism; the view that Britain was the "new Israel," a theme that dates back at least to the seventh century and the Venerable Bede; and a hermeneutic that interpreted biblical prophetic texts as having a literal, future fulfillment. Among the forerunners of this movement was Sir Henry Finch, a prominent lawyer and member of Parliament. In 1621, Finch wrote a treatise in which he called upon the British people and its government to support Jewish settlement in Palestine in order to fulfill biblical prophecy.

As the year 1800 approached, several premillennial theologies emerged as a result of the insecurity surrounding the American and French revolutions. Among them were various utopian movements and the Millerites (a group that later became Seventh-day Adventists). During this period John Nelson Darby (1800-82), a renegade Anglican priest from Ireland, popularized and systematized eschatological themes while simultaneously developing a new school of thought which has been called "futurist premillennialism."

During 60 years of unceasing travel and preaching across the European continent and North America, Darby converted a generation of evangelical clergy and laity to his views. Darby held that biblical prophecies and much of scripture must be interpreted according to a literal and predictive hermeneutic. He believed that the true church will be removed from history through an event called the "rapture" (I Thess. 4:16-17; 5:1-11), and the nation Israel will be restored as God's primary instrument in history.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: agrace
"I don't see how the issue of Christ's return has - or should have - anything to do with Christians' support for the Jews and the Jewish homeland. I would like to think it has more to do with our belief in scripture, which spells out exactly how God feels about His people, how He will never forsake them, will always restore them, and will never break His covenant with them."

Jesus says (about Israel): "I who come in the name of the Father they have rejected but he who comes in his own name they will accept." One can argue about the conventional understanding of the "he who comes in his own name"--my view and the Darby answer is the Anti-Christ. There is certainly no argument that this has already occurred.

Thus Christians must recognize that at some point in the near future, Israel will recognize a False Christ as Messiah--what will our view of Israel be then?

I am a firm public supporter of Israel and the Jews--not only because they are God's chosen people; including the reminant that will inherit the role described by God for His people; but from a secular political point of view, we share an ultimate common heritage and they are one of two or possibly three long term allies of the United States in the support of the Judeo Christian foundation of Western Civilization.

However our support for Israel in this time must be tempered by the knowledge that Israel and the World are searching for competing leadership, not only a political sense that would result in restoration of Israel control of the land but also monetary leadership alternative to the US Dollar. For those who have wisdom, the Anti-Christ's foundation must be recognized as an international monetary system.

With respect to Darby's general eschatological pattern, the only substantive response must be that the Bible prophecies he identifies are not meant to be read litterally--they are to be read allegorically. There may be spirtual fulfillments. But these events are just not to be expected to happen on the ground in the real world.

That whole thesis sounds to me much like the modern world's response to God and the Bible--it's just not real. I reject that. Historically, every word that has been tested--every prophecy that has come to term; has been real. God is here on the ground doing His will in accordance with His plan.

If you don't want to believe that "we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air"--just fine with me. How do you suppose this is going to happen? Did Paul just make all this up?

21 posted on 02/02/2002 6:54:04 AM PST by David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: agrace
>exactly how God feels about His people

Right. And who are His people? You have to know who the players are to understand the game. Click on my Profile to see the player list.

22 posted on 02/02/2002 6:58:49 AM PST by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: David
>from a secular political point of view, we share an ultimate common heritage

Yes indeed, and we share a lot more common heritage than that. It's genetic cousins helping cousins...

23 posted on 02/02/2002 7:01:44 AM PST by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Oh, please. I was speaking of a specific incident. Besides being the Sabbath, it was the beginning of Yom Kippur. He called for, on national television, at a memorial service for dead children, for Jews to attone and be *saved.* I've got a little apprehension at top dogs pretending to be concerned with other souls while disregarding their own. And I do say no. But for you to lump me with People for the American Way is a cheap shot and you know it. I would have expected better from you.
24 posted on 02/02/2002 7:06:11 AM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: week 71
Re-read the above.  Ecumenicism is a lie of the devil.  No one is a brother or sister if they do not obey the Lord.  Most of "the church" is antinomian, refusing to obey the Lord and therefore denying Him and despising His Word, and therefore in error and need to return to their Jewish roots.

Mt 12:48 But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my mother? and who are my brethren?
49 And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren!
50 For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.

Those who love Him keep His commandments.  Those who don't love Him, don't.

--------

Mt 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

Lu 12:51 Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:

25 posted on 02/02/2002 7:11:40 AM PST by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2
It was a cheap shot :-)

But it does get wearisome when people push the idea that Christian proselytizing is ipso facto a bad thing. One can flip this around and make the case that Jews are exclusionary. Rather than rail against either position, I think both are valid. That Jews have been able to keep their traditions intact for thousands of years is wonderful. So is the devotion and sacrifices Christians have made to spread their faith.

Besides, the threat to Jewish identity today is not Christianity, it is secularism.

26 posted on 02/02/2002 7:16:42 AM PST by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Im neither Jewish nor an evangelical( I wonder how many strong supporters Israel has that doesn't fall into either of those catagories).
27 posted on 02/02/2002 8:10:35 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: David
The EU will be our greatest future enemy and Israel hates them.
28 posted on 02/02/2002 8:12:10 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2
Most evangelicals and born again christians are very nice people( a few are Taliban types but they are the minority).
29 posted on 02/02/2002 8:13:28 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: agrace
As a whole, the article makes it sound like evangelicals are focused on nothing but prophecy and what they can gain from its fulfillment. Just because evangelicals believe in prophecy does not mean that they want war. They want the survival of Israel, they want her to justly defend herself against those who seek to destroy her. If that means war happens, so be it. Most Americans feel the same way about our response to Sep 11.

Well said agrace.

30 posted on 02/02/2002 8:15:24 AM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: weikel
weikel, again, I was speaking of the top dogs, not every evangelical. And the instance I cited was very specific. It was a bad move on the worst possible day. It was rattling to hear someone so high up in an organization declare that Jews would burn in hell for not converting. As much as Falwell prays for Israel, I heard him not more than a week ago declare that Jews were doomed to hell if they didn't convert. So, while we are regaled by national leaders of these organizations who praise us on one hand yet doom us wth the other, excuse me for being just a tad skeptical of motive.
31 posted on 02/02/2002 9:40:54 AM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2
A side note. The Judeo traditional law is the same as Sharia in many respects, one being stoning to death of a married woman, raped or not, who would really be witness. It is true it is ignored as Western law prevails and is preferable. Consider Abrahams's treatment of his first born Ishmael, a patriarchal nemesis to the value of a child he chose to have.
32 posted on 02/02/2002 11:46:34 AM PST by boltfromblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: David
I am a firm public supporter of Israel and the Jews--not only because they are God's chosen people; including the reminant that will inherit the role described by God for His people; but from a secular political point of view, we share an ultimate common heritage and they are one of two or possibly three long term allies of the United States in the support of the Judeo Christian foundation of Western Civilization.

AGREED! Not only do I support them from a biblical standpoint, but I support them politically as well. And not only that, but they also have the historical upper hand, if you can dig through all the propaganda that gets thrown around.

That whole thesis sounds to me much like the modern world's response to God and the Bible--it's just not real. I reject that. Historically, every word that has been tested--every prophecy that has come to term; has been real. God is here on the ground doing His will in accordance with His plan.

Agree again, totally.

If you don't want to believe that "we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air"--just fine with me. How do you suppose this is going to happen? Did Paul just make all this up?

Are you referring to ME as "you"? :) I do believe what Paul said, absolutely. I'm not too worried about rapture timing. I've a got a very strong interest in prophecy in general, have studied it quite a bit, and have decided to just be ready no matter what.

33 posted on 02/02/2002 4:11:19 PM PST by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep
Darby was funded by the Illuminati to spread the false doctrine of pre-trib rapture

I have never heard that before. Do you have any links to support that? I'd love to read about it, thanks.

34 posted on 02/02/2002 4:20:01 PM PST by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: agrace
Here are a couple of links to start. My computer is really tasked right now so I can't do much now. Sorry. Try some key words out of these docs in Google advanced search.

TARGETS OF THE ILLUMINATI

DARBY AND SCOFIELD

35 posted on 02/02/2002 5:43:24 PM PST by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: agrace
Here's another. Not my usual source: http://www.rense.com/general5/brit.htm
36 posted on 02/02/2002 5:49:42 PM PST by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: agrace; Nix 2; veronica; Thinkin' Gal; Jeremiah Jr; Prodigal Daughter; Yehuda; TrueBeliever9...
Nix 2 wrote in #6:  >The next scheduled speaker was the head of Baptist Minitries. He gave a speech excoriating the Jews at a service for dead children. I have never quite understood that vitriol at that particular time, but it sharpened my awareness of things going on around me that I might otherwise not have noticed, isolated as I am. I don't condemn anyone else's religion except, perhaps for Islam, but I must adnit, Evangelical Baptisits have given me great pause.

agrace wrote in #10: >I'd like to think it is rather that we love the Jewish people because God loves them, that we respect His covenant with them, and remember that we are grafted into their tree.

Right.  They are grafted in and how the Lord regathers and restores them is a mystery that is unfolding and is wondrous to see.  The Baptist preacher mentioned in post #6 is boasting against the branches which he was expressly warned in Romans 11 not to do, lest he be cut-off.  That sound of a tree falling in the forest is the lopped off, dead, unfruitful branches of those who say they abide but do not.  That Baptist is in major error and teaching it just like Martin Luther did.

400 years is a biblical type of bondage: in Egypt, in departing from the Law which Josiah restored when it was found in the wall, and so on.  It is 400 years to the day that the Ottomans had control:

...October 31, 1517 to October 31, 1917 = 400 years.  The British Lord, General Edmund Allenby, took Beersheba and began his drive toward Jerusalem.  Israel a nation in 1948 was a total of 430 years which was the total years in Egypt.  (The U.N. reared its ugly head about that time, a bigger brother of the 1917 League of Nations.)

At the same time, on the same day...

...October 31, 1517 Martin Luther nailed his 95 Theses to the door at Wittenberg (considered to be the start of the Reformation) and derailed the church into continued and furthered apostacy (bondage to inherited lies), and deceived many by teaching falsely about the Jews, the Law, Sabbath worship, adding "alone" to the scripture following "faith," and excluding James from the Bible.

..."From the Catholic (Roman) teaching of justification by works of penance, etc., Luther went to the opposite extreme of justification without works. This idea caused him to deny that the Epistle of James was inspired, because James said, 'Faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.' This attitude made Luther spurn the true Christian Sabbath."  (History of the Sabbath by Andrews.  See third edition, 1887) ...Why the Protestant Reformation Failed!
But the church didn't recover itself in 1917.  70 X 7 or 490 is another frequent biblical picture.  1517 + 490 will be 2007, an interesting number for those who hold things loosely...and, No, that is not a prediction. Other events of 1917: WW1 ended, League of Nations, Fatima appeared to three children in Portugal.

Hitler planned Krystallnacht (the beginning of the round-up and extermination of the Jews) on Nov. 9/10, 1938 in honor of Martin Luther's birthday for Luther's blueprint for getting rid of the Jews, a book entitled, "On the Jews and their lies."  We know that man (Luther) is false by his fruit and notice the stinking fruit in the deceived Baptist above as well.

A major scripture for this day for Christians should be:

Jer 16:19 O LORD, my strength, and my fortress, and my refuge in the day of affliction, the Gentiles shall come unto thee from the ends of the earth, and shall say, Surely our fathers have inherited lies, vanity, and things wherein there is no profit.
If we truly love Truth and He who IS Truth, then when we are confronted with Truth that was hid from us before, we should embrace Truth and cast away that which is false of tradition and doctrines of men.  To not do so is Idolatry.

Ec 12:13 Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.

1Ch 28:9 And thou, Solomon my son, know thou the God of thy father, and serve him with a perfect heart and with a willing mind: for the LORD searcheth all hearts, and understandeth all the imaginations of the thoughts: if* thou seek him, he will be found of thee; but if** thou forsake him, he will cast thee off for ever.

Obedience and faithfulness are written in the Torah from beginning to end and continue a daily lifetime walk of continuing in the Word.  Many have been deceived into thinking they don't have to continue because they have already arrived.  They do err.

*if thou seek. 2Ch 15:2; Pr 2:1-6; Isa 45:19; 55:6-7; Jer 29:13; Mt 7:7-8; Jas 4:8-11

**if thou forsake. De 31:16-17; 1Ki 9:6-9; Ezr 8:22; Isa 1:28; Heb 10:38-39

Anti-Judiasm and the Council of Nicea
Why the Protestant Reformation Failed!
Anti-Semitism of the "Church Fathers"
Yashanet: Not Subject to the Law of God?
LCMS (Lutheran Church Missouri Synod) statement on Martin Luther's error
Martin Luther and John Calvin Offer Some Advice on The Jews
Martin Luther's dirty little book: On the Jews and their lies
Crash Course in Jewish History Part 50 - The Reformation and the Jews - Luther
Ottoman Rule 400 years
Martin Luther: the author of "The Jews and Their Lies"
Gates of Jewish Heritage: Germany in the 16th Century

37 posted on 02/02/2002 6:29:10 PM PST by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Good article, thanks for posting!
38 posted on 02/02/2002 6:36:52 PM PST by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: week 71
Since God the Son chose to become a Jew, and He has not put off his Jewish flesh in his exaltation nor ever will, then it would kind of seem a no-brainer that hating Jews = hating the God Christians worship. Karl Barth, not what you'd call a born-again evangelical, but a fellow who read the Bible a little, pointed that out to German university students when he lectured there just after the war.
39 posted on 02/02/2002 6:43:53 PM PST by Southern Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep
Thank you, 2sheep. This is very eloquent and you have my respect for having the heart to say what's true. No one, especially me, is always right all the time, but I do know wrong when I see it and righteousness when it appears. This was a very courageous post on your part when you could have left it alone.

PAX

40 posted on 02/02/2002 6:45:19 PM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson