Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Electrical pulses break light speed record
Physics WEB ^ | 22 January 2002 | (A Haché and L Poirier 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 518).

Posted on 01/24/2002 8:52:48 AM PST by vannrox

Electrical pulses break light speed record
22 January 2002


Pulses that travel faster than light have been sent over a significant distance for the first time. Alain Haché and Louis Poirier of the University of Moncton in Canada transmitted the pulses through a 120-metre cable made from a coaxial 'photonic crystal'. The achievement raises hopes that data could travel through electronic communications systems at almost the speed of light (A Haché and L Poirier 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 518).


When a pulse of radiation travels through a 'dispersive' medium, different wavelengths in the pulse move at different speeds and the pulse becomes distorted. Ordinary dispersion arises when the refractive index of a material changes with increasing wavelength. This stretches out the pulse and reduces the group velocity - the speed at which the peak of the pulse travels.


But 'anomalous dispersion' can occur in materials that absorb radiation in a certain range of wavelengths. The refractive index on either side of this absorption band changes sharply with wavelength. In these regions, the components of radiation at the tail of the pulse interfere destructively, and the peak of the wave is effectively pushed forward.


To create their cable, the Canadian researchers joined together five-metre sections of coaxial cable with alternating electrical impedences. Radiation in the frequency range 9 - 11 MHz is partially reflected at the boundaries of these segments, which gives the cable its absorption band. Haché and Poirier sent electromagnetic pulses with frequencies between 5 and 15 MHz through the cable, and found that the group velocity reached three times the speed of light for frequencies in the absorption band.


Haché and Poirier emphasize that their experiment does not break any laws of physics. Although the group velocity exceeds the speed of light - an effect permitted by relativity - each component of the pulse travels slower than light. It would be impossible to transmit information faster than light because it would be encoded onto a single frequency component.


But as Haché explains, many existing information systems are based on coaxial cables, and the current top speed for data is just two-thirds the speed of light. If the impedance of such cables were adapted, pulses sent at frequencies close to the absorption band could transmit information at speeds approaching that of light.


'Oddly, the reason no one has done this before is that we are using what most people are trying to avoid - the back-reflection caused by impedance mismatch', Haché told PhysicsWeb. 'But as far as superluminal propagation goes, this is the key'.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
ERP...
1 posted on 01/24/2002 8:52:49 AM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox
BTT
2 posted on 01/24/2002 8:58:12 AM PST by Bigg Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
coaxial cable with alternating electrical impedences

I am not sure I understand what is meant by "alternating electrical impedences". However, if it means that the impedances were purposely mismatched at each section of cable I have a grasp of the information offered.

3 posted on 01/24/2002 9:03:13 AM PST by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Is the following sexually suggestive or is it just me?

When a pulse of radiation travels through a 'dispersive' medium, different wavelengths in the pulse move at different speeds and the pulse becomes distorted

4 posted on 01/24/2002 9:05:50 AM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Well, did they or didn't they? Some kind of pulse travelled at 3xC, but data still can't travel at quite C. Sounds like the story hasn't changed. I remember an article in a ham magazine back in the late 50s describing a wire loop where a pulse could be made to travel at speeds above C. What was the author's name? Green, I think.
5 posted on 01/24/2002 9:11:22 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Ok, I get it:
Nothing Goes Faster Than Light
6 posted on 01/24/2002 9:48:22 AM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
I hope you know a good therapist.
7 posted on 01/24/2002 9:53:08 AM PST by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
Nothing Goes Faster Than Light

It might if they powered it from a perpetual motion machine!

SL

8 posted on 01/24/2002 9:55:55 AM PST by smokinleroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
"...To create their cable, the Canadian researchers joined together five-metre sections of coaxial cable with alternating electrical impedences. Radiation in the frequency range 9 - 11 MHz is partially reflected at the boundaries of these segments, which gives the cable its absorption band. Haché and Poirier sent electromagnetic pulses with frequencies between 5 and 15 MHz through the cable, and found that the group velocity reached three times the speed of light for frequencies in the absorption band..."


So from what I understand this is only applicable in the 9 to 11 MHz range and is void at lower frequencies than 9MHZ and higher than 11 MHZ. But that is only in respect to the given test. It would be rather hasty to conclude that it is unique to the absorbption band of the physical cable. That is what is being implied by this article. If you take this as it is implied then...


Use of the cable in a advanced computer would enable faster operation that one that utilizes a CPU at frequencies of 1GHz. I find that exclusionary.

9 posted on 01/24/2002 9:56:55 AM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Some kind of pulse travelled at 3xC

3xC in a 1xC zone. Boy, yo's in a HEAPA trouble!

186,000 miles per second: it's not just a good idea, IT'S THE LAW!

10 posted on 01/24/2002 9:59:53 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
They obviously used a trans-warp conduit.
11 posted on 01/24/2002 11:03:21 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
If they're going to build faster than light communications, why hasn't the me of tomorrow contacted the me of today and let me know what companies to invest in?

Future me must be a lazy ass.

12 posted on 01/24/2002 11:06:54 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
They obviously used a trans-warp conduit.

Not only that, but it was the Vulcans that gave them the idea.

13 posted on 01/24/2002 11:25:39 AM PST by skateman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
A pulse travelling faster than the data. Is that like if I had a really bright flashlight, and swept the beam across an arc of sky from Mercury to the moon in a second, say 95 million miles or 500 light-seconds?

The spot of light travels at 500 c or any speed you like, and yet any data from Mercury to the moon takes 500 seconds to arrive.

Mrs VS

14 posted on 01/24/2002 11:43:59 AM PST by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
BUMP
15 posted on 01/24/2002 12:06:43 PM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor
Yes, that is one way to look at it. Interference patterns are used to aim radar beams and they can switch instantly from one look angle to another. The pulse propagation is very similar. It looks superficially like a wavefront, but isn't carrying any information.
16 posted on 01/24/2002 12:15:47 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson