Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ZALMAY KHALILZAD SAYS AL-QA’EDA GUERILLAS ARE IN IRAN
IRAN PRESS SERVICE ^

Posted on 01/19/2002 5:57:42 AM PST by Bad~Rodeo

Kabol 18 Jan. (IPS) United States Special Envoy for Afghanistan Mr. Zalmay Khalilzad accused Friday the Islamic Republic of not allowing Washington access to the "Al Qa’eda" Muslim guerilleros it is sheltering.

"Al-Qa’eda fighters have crossed from Afghanistan into Iran but Tehran is not allowing the United States access to those it has detained", Mr. Khalilzad said during a press conference in Kabol at the end of his visit to the war-ravaged Asian nation.

The remarks from the Afghan-born Khalilzad was the latest in a series of American accusation against Iran and followed the unprecedented stern warnings of the U.S. President George W. Bush's call on Tehran to hand over the "Al Qa’eda" and Taleban leaders who have fled to Iran in the one hand and stop operations aimed at destabilising the present Afghan interim government.

"If they (the Iranian ruling ayatollahs) in any way, shape or form try to destabilise the (Afghan) government, the (US-led international) coalition will first deal with them, in diplomatic ways", President Bush said last week during a press briefing at the White House.

"We would hope, for example, they wouldn't allow Al Qa’eda murderers to hide in their country. We would hope that if that be the case, if someone tries to flee into Iran, that they would hand them over to us", Mr. Bush said, adding that he would very much like to see the Iranians to be active participants in a stable Afghanistan.

The warning send shivers to Iranian clerical rulers. In telephone calls to the British and Afghan prime ministers, Mr. Tony Blair and Mr. Hamed Karzai, both among President Bush’s closest friends and allies, President Mohammad Khatami, himself a middle-rank cleric, assured them that Tehran was not destabilising the Afghan government nor is sheltering any member of Al Qa’eda or the Taleban.

His explanations followed a threat made earlier by the former president Ayatollah Ali Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani who, during a Friday sermon, had warned indirectly both London and Washington that Iran might resume terrorist attacks on American and British interests.

Denouncing President Bush’s accusations as "baseless" and based on information fed by "Zionist circles", the Iranian Foreign Ministry had further reiterated that Iran has not only sealed all its borders with Afghanistan, but issued orders for necessity of obtaining visas for entering the country from all Arab countries, "to avoid entrance of unwanted guests!"

However, Iran Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi had all the same not ruled out the possibility of "sneaking in of Taleban or Al Qa’eda escaping figures into Iranian soil", adding "Iran will definitely put to trail such figures if they are spotted and detained in Iran".

Speaking to reporters, Mr. Khalilzad said that Washington also has reason to fear Iran is trying to stir up trouble for Afghanistan's new interim Administration with "hostile acts such as providing arms and sending Islamic militants into the country".

He said Washington would consider Tehran was meddling in Afghan affairs if it armed or funded local groups without approval from Kabol, sent in militants from its Revolutionary Guards or Afghans it has trained in the Sepah Mohammad (Mohammad's Soldiers) group or encouraged people to oppose the central administration.

Mr. Khalilzad cited reports that Iran may be sending pro-Iranian Afghan fighters and money into Afghanistan and encouraging opposition to the Administration of Hamed Karzai, which was inaugurated in December after the fall of the Taleban militia and mandated to rule for six months.

Earlier in the month a spokesman for the Governor of Qandahar had reported the presence of Iranian intelligence operatives in western provinces of Afghanistan, distributing arms, money, ammunitions to local commanders and seditious propaganda among the population, describing Mr. Karzai as a "puppet" of American "infidels".

"I think they have some al Qa’eda people in their possession but they have not made them available to the United States", said Mr. Khalilzad, the highest-ranking Muslim in the Bush Administration.

Based on reports from eyewitnesses, Iran Press Service had reported that Mr. Hashemi-Rafsanjani had personally escorted some 70 to 90 "seemingly high-ranking" Taleban and "Arab-looking" personalities from Mash-had, the capital of Iran’s north-eastern Province of Khorasan to Tehran.

According to Mr. Khalilzad, "quite a few" Al Qa’eda fighters had slipped into Iran since the Taleban were defeated in November, following American military intervention in Afghanistan.

Mr. Khalilzad said he had made U.S. concerns clear to Isma’il Khan, the powerful Governor of Heart, during a recent visit to the western city that is close to Iranian border. Esma’il Khan lived in Iran for much of the five years Afghanistan was ruled by the Taleban and is known to be close to the Iranian conservatives who have the upper hand in the Iranian leadership.

"I think there is reason to be concerned about all of these," Mr. Khalilzad said, quoting merely sources among "tribal people!"

"At least one large group of Arabs and their families have fled into Iran", local tribal sources have told the US Envoy.

In its rejection of American accusations, Iran observed that it was one of the Northern Alliance’s staunchest supporters, helping the Alliance resisting the then ruling Taleban.

Iran had also condemned the 11 September attacks on America, attributed to Al Qa’eda, but then not only it refused to co-operate with Washington in fighting terrorism, but also condemned American military operations in Afghanistan on the assumption that the final aim is to overthrow the Islamic regime of Iran.

Meanwhile, Mr. Karzai left Friday for Saudi Arabia, one of the three countries with Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates that recognised the ousted Taleban regime of Afghanistan.

But the Kingdom, that is also the birthplace of Osama Ben Laden, the leader of Al Qa’eda, severed relations with the Taleban after the New York and Washington attacks.

Though the main reason of the trip seems to be performing the "Omra Haj", to Mecca, Muslim’s holiest shrines, nevertheless, the visit is criticised by many Afghans and Afghan watchers, reminding the Kingdom’s financial support of the Taleban.

"Though Karzai might ask the Saudi’s to put an end to their proselytise in Afghanistan, as they did during the rule of the Taleban and also ask them for contribution to reconstruction projects, but nevertheless, it is more important for him to pay greater attention to his immediate and powerful neighbours, Iran and Pakistan", observed Mr. Changiz Pahlavan, a noted Iranian expert on Afghanistan and Central Asia.

Actually, on his way to Riyadh, Mr. Karzai made a stop over in Islamabad where he briefly met with Pakistan’s President Parviz Mosharraf.

After this visit and talks with Saudi rulers, Mr. Karzai would head to Tokyo for a conference of donor nations aimed at raising an initial $5 billion in aid for his war-devastated country before going to Washington for a meeting with President Bush on 28 January. ENDS AFQANESTAN IRAN 18102


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/19/2002 5:57:42 AM PST by Bad~Rodeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bad~Rodeo
I think Iran may be worried about a democracy on their eastern border. The populace there is already eager to be free of the oppressive rule of the ayahtollas. The example of a functioning prosperous Afghanistan may prove too much for them to take.
2 posted on 01/19/2002 6:21:43 AM PST by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bad~Rodeo
bttt
3 posted on 01/19/2002 6:26:16 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Aren't we terrific? What other country on earth would have a Zall Khalilzad, fluent in endless Afghan tongues, sitting on the staff of the National Security Council, ready to go to Kabul and speak the truth?

And he's a delightful man, too.

4 posted on 01/19/2002 6:46:34 AM PST by MLedeen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MLedeen,AGAviator,JeepInMazar
Rebump!
5 posted on 01/19/2002 6:48:31 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
The example of a functioning prosperous Afghanistan may prove too much for them to take.

What a laugh! Talk about the ultimate oxymoron! Now that the Taliban are gone the various warlords can go back to controlling their own little piece of Afghanistan. There will be no peace nor will there be any prosperity once we're gone. As long as there are muslims in Afghanistan the country is doomed to live in the 8th century.

6 posted on 01/19/2002 7:59:34 AM PST by AlaskaErik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
There is always going to be some interaction between Iran and Persian-speaking (Tajik Northern Alliance)Afghans. Iran certainly does not want its investment in the Northern Alliance to go to waste.

However several years ago the Taliban massacred about a dozen Iranian diplomats at a consulate in Afghanistan and the Iranians almost went to war against them. It doesn't seem real likely the Iranian government is consciously and deliberately welcoming these same people.

7 posted on 01/19/2002 11:25:49 PM PST by AGAviator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AGAviator
Good point!
8 posted on 01/20/2002 7:19:40 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AGAviator
The Taliban massacred Iranians. Why does that preclude them from harboring Al Qaeda who are mostly not Afghanis?
9 posted on 01/20/2002 7:35:18 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: breakem
Among those somewhat to extremely supportive of jihad, the big issue is who will be running the show and whose ideology and national interests will come first.

Al-Qaeda are Arabic-speaking Sunnis and the Iranians are Persian-speaking Shiites. This isn't to say they're completely irreconcilable, but somebody will have to accept a subordinate role and it's the nature of all these people to want to be the supreme leader.

About the only thing that could ever make these people cooperate fully IMO is a really dangerous common enemy.

Plus as I've said Iran already has quite an investment in the Northern Alliance and it's much easier to influence the NA people in the new government and have some degree of Russian support.

What I think this is about is Khalilzad trying to neutralize the Iranian influence by trying to tar them with the Taliban/Al Qaeda label.

10 posted on 01/20/2002 8:53:52 PM PST by AGAviator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson