Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Enron Contacted 2 Cabinet Officers Before Collapsing
New York Times ^ | Friday, January 11, 2002 | By ELISABETH BUMILLER

Posted on 01/11/2002 12:17:07 AM PST by JohnHuang2

January 11, 2002

Enron Contacted 2 Cabinet Officers Before Collapsing

By ELISABETH BUMILLER

WASHINGTON, Jan. 10 — The White House disclosed today that Kenneth L. Lay, the chairman of the Enron Corporation (news/quote) and one of President Bush's biggest political contributors, telephoned two cabinet officers last fall, and one of them said Mr. Lay had sought government help with its dire financial condition.

Both said they declined to offer government aid.

In a day of rapid-fire developments, Attorney General John Ashcroft excused himself from all matters involving Enron because of campaign contributions he received from it.

In addition, Enron's auditors said they had destroyed numerous company documents and electronic communications.

The Justice Department said on Wednesday that it had created a nationwide task force to conduct a criminal investigation into the collapse of Enron, an energy trading company with close ties to Mr. Bush and many top administration officials.

Today, the entire United States Attorney's office in Houston recused itself from the investigation, saying many of its approximately 100 lawyers, including the chief prosecutor, Michael T. Shelby, had family or other relationships with people affected by Enron's filing on Dec. 2 for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law.

The White House moved quickly to contain the damage. The White House spokesman said Mr. Bush was made aware of the phone calls to the cabinet members only this morning during an Oval Office meeting.

"What you have here is a case where a contributor called up and asked for something but did not get it," said Ari Fleischer, the White House press secretary.

Yet the two cabinet secretaries who received calls from Mr. Lay described somewhat different conversations. Commerce Secretary Donald L. Evans said that Mr. Lay had indicated he would welcome any government help with its bond ratings, while Treasury Secretary Paul H. O'Neill said the Enron chairman requested no assistance at all.

Enron officials disputed the White House version of events this evening and said Mr. Lay was not asking for assistance from the Bush administration in calling Mr. O'Neill and Mr. Evans, Mr. Bush's presidential campaign chairman and chief fund-raiser. Enron officials also said Mr. Lay had called Alan Greenspan, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, to alert him to the company's problems.

Mr. Lay was simply informing the government about the possible bankruptcy filing of the nation's seventh largest company, Enron officials said, as has been the practice of executives of other large companies whose collapse could affect worldwide financial markets.

"He did not ask for anything," said Mark Palmer, an Enron spokesman.

Enron's troubles and its numerous links to the Bush administration threatened to consume the president's time and attention even as he enjoys high approval ratings for his conduct of the war on terrorism.

As morning newspapers announced the expanding Justice Department investigation today, Mr. Bush summoned reporters to the Oval Office to declare that he had instructed his economic advisers to develop a plan to protect workers' pensions from similar corporate failures. Thousands of Enron employees lost their life savings and much of their retirement accounts when the company's stock became virtually worthless last November.

Enron's auditor, the giant accounting firm Arthur Andersen, then said that it had destroyed a "significant" volume of documents related to Enron. The firm said it was still gathering information about the episode before deciding if it would discipline the employees involved.

The Securities and Exchange Commission, which is investigating both Enron's collapse and Andersen's conduct, said its inquiry would be expanded to include the destruction of documents, in addition to looking into whether it had created off- the-books private partnerships that disguised the true financial condition of the company.

Almost simultaneously, Attorney General Ashcroft said he was recusing himself from oversight of the criminal investigation of the company's collapse because of his relationship with Enron. Common Cause reported today that a canvass of federal election records showed that Mr. Ashcroft had received a total of $54,499 from the company and Mr. Lay for his 2000 Senate campaign.

Enron, which pioneered deregulation of the nation's power business and grew to be one of the world's largest energy companies before its sudden fall, has long nurtured close ties to Mr. Bush. But in the Oval Office today, the president went to some length to distance himself from Mr. Lay, who he said had been a supporter of Governor Ann Richards of Texas when Mr. Bush defeated her in 1994.

"And she named him the head of the Governor's Business Council," Mr. Bush said. "And I decided to leave him in place, just for the sake of continuity. And that's when I first got to know Ken and worked with Ken."

Mr. Bush said that he had never discussed the financial problems of Enron with Mr. Lay and that he had last seen him in the spring, at a fund- raising event in Houston. Mr. Fleischer said Mr. Bush had not talked to Mr. Lay since the spring.

It was Mr. Fleischer who first told reporters this morning, almost as an afterthought at a sparsely attended early news briefing, that Mr. Lay had called both Mr. O'Neill and Mr. Evans last fall to alert them about the company's financial straits.

Officials at the Treasury and Commerce Departments said Mr. Lay had spoken to Mr. O'Neill about Enron's condition on Oct. 28 and Nov. 8 and had spoken to Mr. Evans on Oct. 29. Although Mr. Lay had maintained until late October an optimistic public face about Enron's future, on Oct. 16 the company reported a third- quarter net loss of $618 million. On the same day, Moody's Investors Service announced that Enron's long-term debt obligations were on review.

The dates of the calls and the announcements of the bad financial news about the company are significant. If Mr. Lay had made the calls earlier in October, before the state of the company was widely known, the Bush administration would have been aware of the true condition of Enron while Mr. Lay was promoting a different story on Wall Street.

In an interview on CNBC tonight, Mr. O'Neill said Mr. Lay had not asked for a government bailout or other intervention to save the company.

"He called me to advise me that Enron's problems were mounting and to offer access for our technical people to talk with his technical people about the contracts that they had that were causing them problems," Mr. O'Neill said. "I subsequently asked the undersecretary of the Treasury to speak with the Enron people, which he did, so that we could satisfy ourselves that the Enron affairs were not going to have a negative impact on U.S. capital markets."

Asked whether Mr. Lay asked for government assistance, Mr. O'Neill said "Absolutely not."

On the same CNBC program, Mr. Evans said Mr. Lay had told him that Moody's Investors Service was likely downgrade its rating of the company's debt.

Mr. Lay then said that if there was anything Mr. Evans could do to help the company deal with Moody's (news/quote) "we would welcome that." But, Mr. Evans added, Mr. Lay did not ask him specifically to intervene with Moody's.

"I listened to him and listened to their condition and listened to the issues he wanted to raise," Mr. Evans said. "Subsequent to that I talked to Secretary O'Neill and told him I had the call. It was a pretty easy decision to make. I don't think there was anything for us to do. Secretary O'Neill agreed with me there was not so we didn't do anything."

A Commerce Department official said today that in Mr. Lay's call with Mr. Evans, "there was no information discussed that wasn't already in the public domain."

Mr. Fleischer said that Mr. Bush was first told this morning in the Oval Office by Mr. O'Neill and Mr. Evans that Mr. Lay had made the calls to them and that they had not been willing to intervene to help. The president then told Mr. O'Neill and Mr. Evans, according to Mr. Fleischer's account, "You did the right thing."

Mr. Fleischer said the president expressed no surprise, regret or annoyance that he had not been informed of the calls from Mr. Lay until more than two months after they occurred.

"Bankruptcies happen in our economy," Mr. Fleischer said. "And it's not uncommon for people who are in the community, business community or in the labor community, to talk to a cabinet secretary to tell them about the financial status of their business and it ends there."

Democrats on Capitol Hill moved immediately to question the White House statements. "It is now clear the White House had knowledge that Enron was likely to collapse but did nothing to try to protect innocent employees and shareholders who ultimately lost their life savings," said Representative Henry A. Waxman, the California Democrat who is his party's senior member on the House Government Reform Committee.

Mr. Fleischer said that he hoped that any Congressional inquiry would be even-handed and that if it became "a one-party witch hunt, I think the Congress is going again to remind the country on why people soured and tired of those types of partisan investigations."

Mr. Lay and Enron executives have given more than $550,000 to Mr. Bush's various campaigns, and Mr. Lay also gave $100,000 to Mr. Bush's inaugural committee.

But Mr. Lay does not appear to have been a frequent recent visitor to the White House, based on publicly available records. He visited the White House only twice during the first five months of Mr. Bush's presidency, according to Secret Service access control records obtained by The New York Times (news/quote) under the Freedom of Information Act. The first visit occurred on Feb. 22, 2001, the day Enron officials met with the staff of Vice President Dick Cheney's energy task force.

The second visit, the records show, was on April 17, the day Mr. Lay and other Enron officials met with Mr. Cheney for about a half-hour. Enron officials freely discussed the meeting last year with reporters, providing a copy of the memorandum on electricity issues the company presented to Mr. Cheney.

One month later, Mr. Cheney's energy policy task force issued its final report. In the section on deregulation of the electricity markets, the report's recommendations resembled much of what Enron had advocated. They also tracked with policies advocated by Mr. Bush during the 2000 presidential campaign.

Mr. Cheney, in an interview last year, denied that Enron had improperly influenced the task force's deliberations, saying the task force would "make decisions based on what we think makes sound public policy," not what "Enron thinks."



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Quote of the Day by IowaHawk
1 posted on 01/11/2002 12:17:07 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnHuang2
The White House moved quickly to contain the damage.

There's "damage" to be contained? Or where there is smoke, there is fire? Did even ONE Clinton crony EVER recuse himself during the 8 years Clinton was in office?

3 posted on 01/11/2002 12:26:47 AM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

And they say character doesn't count

The decision by the U.S. Department of Justice to set up a special task force to spearhead a criminal probe of the circumstances surrounding the sudden collapse of Enron Corp. should come to no one's surprise.

After all, this isn't the Reno/Clinton DOJ anymore.

Recall the myriad stunts the Clinton White House would roguishly pull to frustrate, stonewall, impede or choke-off legitimate inquiries into Whitewater, Chinagate, Travelgate, Filegate, impeachment, etc. Indeed, in the Tyson Food case alone, tallying up the number of roadblocks and backroom maneuvers to bottleneck the work of Independent Counsel Donald Smaltz could easily fill the Clinton library -- and then some.

Moreover, the department's decision to plumb the depths of the looting and fraud -- the mammoth shellgame -- which led this erstwhile energy trading colossus, whose stock once traded at $90/share, straight into bankruptcy court last December has wider implications, beyond the prosecutorial.

The Justice Department, by taking this unprecedented step, steals the thunder right from under the partisan Bush-haters on Capitol Hill. U.S. Senators Carl Levin (D-Mich) and Joseph Lieberman (D-Conn) -- the latter mulling a run for the White House in '04 -- had planned to launch a lavish fishing expedition, featuring highfalutin, made-for-TV, dog-n-pony 'show-trial' "hearings", all in the "noble" pursuit of trafficking in innuendo, in the hopes of inflicting maximum damage on the Bush administration.

Senator Levin et al wouldn't want to jeopardize the Enron investigation, or undermine the tedious work of prosecutors while tipping-off potential criminal targets, just to indulge their cheap, political vendetta against this President, now would they? (Wink, wink).

In coordinating the work of prosecutors in cities across the land, and mustering the dept's fraud section to the task, DOJ catapults this probe on the fast track, rendering any shrieks of 'cover-up' wholly vacant and silly.

As in all investigations, expect the unexpected. In the end, ironically enough, the Democrats may rue having foolishly politicized the fall of Enron. DOJ, un-encumbered by petty political considerations, will probe ALL of Enron's nefarious dealings/machinations. Particularly delicious are the links between former TVA (Tennessee Valley Authority) director Johnny Hayes, Charles Bone of Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs, a Nashville law firm and one former U.S. vice-president who's sporting a beard these days. Gore pals Hayes and Combs, according to a recent MSNBC report, were paid lucrative sums last year by -- you guessed it -- Enron Corp. for lobbying purposes.

But that's not all. According to the Tribune-Review, Enron and the Clinton-Gore administration were joined at the hip, profiting mutually from their incestuous relationship. Bill Clinton personally opened up many overseas markets for Enron especially, and Enron, in return, introduced Clinton-Gore to the infamous Lippo Industries and John Huang. But there's more -- much more, all of which will now come under the proverbial kleig lights.

And they say character doesn't count, eh?

My two cents..
"JohnHuang2"


4 posted on 01/11/2002 12:34:37 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The Democrats and the media will hang themselves by pursuing a smear campaign against the Bush administration over the Enron collapse. That dog don't hunt.
I feel so folksy
5 posted on 01/11/2002 12:38:59 AM PST by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
My two cents..

Bump!

6 posted on 01/11/2002 12:42:03 AM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
That dog don't hunt.

Not only will that dog not hunt, that dog's name was Rover, and he's now dead all over. (Kinda feelin' a tad folksy myself...;^)

7 posted on 01/11/2002 12:42:23 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
=^)
8 posted on 01/11/2002 12:43:20 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Today, the entire United States Attorney's office in Houston recused itself from the investigation, saying many of its approximately 100 lawyers, including the chief prosecutor, Michael T. Shelby, had family or other relationships with people affected by Enron's filing on Dec. 2 for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law.

The White House moved quickly to contain the damage. The White House spokesman said Mr. Bush was made aware of the phone calls to the cabinet members only this morning during an Oval Office meeting.

So, the staff in Houston recused themselves because they apparently owned stock in the company in question, and the Times spins this as "damage"?

Nope, no bias here folks.

9 posted on 01/11/2002 2:29:05 AM PST by PogySailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The danger this Enron scandal poses to consevatives is its effect on privatisation of Social Security. This will be used as an example of why people must depend upon the government program instead of investing everything privately.
10 posted on 01/11/2002 2:31:02 AM PST by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Oops, I forgot to add a folksyism: Howdy, we're from the gummint, and we're here to you hep you.
11 posted on 01/11/2002 2:38:15 AM PST by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Democrats on Capitol Hill moved immediately to question the White House statements. "It is now clear the White House had knowledge that Enron was likely to collapse but did nothing to try to protect innocent employees and shareholders who ultimately lost their life savings," said Representative Henry A. Waxman, the California Democrat who is his party's senior member on the House Government Reform Committee.
Hey Waxman- weren't you on Gray Davis' bandwagon demanding that the government cap what Enron could charge California, to stop them from gouging the consumers?

You do realize that would have put them under even sooner, don't you?

Are you admitting that you cared more for Davis' political fortunes than you did for the innocent employees and shareholders of Enron who ultimately lost their life savings?

12 posted on 01/11/2002 2:42:01 AM PST by Hugh Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA;PogySailor
Democrats, who still bear the scars from the Clinton scandal machine, believe they've (finally) hit pay-dirt with the Enron debacle.

And so does the media.

The 'Grey Lady' of yellow journalism, predictably, was on the warpath yesterday. In a piece ominously titled, "White House Moves to Contain Political Damage From Enron Turmoil", "reporter" Jack Lynch wrote in his opening paragraph that Enron chief Kenneth Lay "had contacted two Cabinet members a few weeks before the giant energy company's collapse to warn of it's growing difficulties".

Clearly, the writer's implicit aim was not to inform so much as to cast aspersions on the Bush administration with derogatory innuendo and smear. The reader is beckoned to assume the worst -- ergo, some malfeasance had taken place -- sans a smidgen of evidence. By artfully lifting these calls wholly out of context, Mr. Lynch ipso facto maliciously insinuates guilt -- guilt on Bush's part, as much as the two Cabinet officers Mr. Lay contacted.

Indeed, only well into his article (paragraph 7) does Mr. Lynch, after weaving his mudslinging web of innuendo, finally divulge the actual mission behind these calls, one to Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, the other to Commerce Secretary Don Evans. Both calls were reportedly made last October, prior to Enron's spectacular collapse in early December.

The reason for Lynch's beguiling foot-dragging? Simply this: Far from snarling Bush administration officials in wrongdoing, the calls were inherently exculpatory. Yes, you heard right -- exculpatory. After warning Secretaries O'Neill and Evans of Enron's precarious financial position, Mr. Lay beseeched them for a bailout. Absent massive government assistance, the troubled company would slide into bankruptcy, the officials were told. Their answer, according to White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, was flat-out no. No bailout.

Agree or disagree with the decision, the refusal is inconsistent with the notion of Mr. Lay having undue influence over this administration. In fact, the bailout denial is the opposite of what one would expect if campaign money and friendship were what they are cracked up to be.

Imagine the outcry had the bailout request been granted. The raging firestorm among frothing Bush critics would rival Nixon's Watergate.

"Quid-Pro-Quo! Quid-Pro-Quo!", they would shriek. As far as punishment, the haters would be divided, however: Some would demand impeachment, others a public hanging.

Instead, the erstwhile oil trading colossus, with 20,000 employees, and marketing business in everything from pulp to bandwidth, was allowed to go belly-up. It's high-flying stock tumbled from $90 per share to under a dollar today.

So much for the 'Ken Lay-controls-George W. Bush' urban legend.

Moreover, the Justice department's decision to convene a national task force to probe Enron's demise -- an unprecedented maneuver -- only further debunks the nitpickers' swill. But the department went even further yesterday. To avoid even the appearance of 'conflict-of-interests', Attorney General John Ashcroft (who had received Enron contributions during his Senate campaign) announced his recusal from all matters pertaining to the Enron investigation. The recusal includes his chief-of-staff, David Ayers.

To get even further ahead of the curve, President Bush yesterday directed the Treasury, Labor and Commerce departments to comb the plethora of rules governing 401 (k) and other pension plans with a fine tooth comb. His goal is to ferret out the flaws in a system which allowed Enron employees to lose their life's saving when the company went under.

The President wants reform in corporate disclosure rules, as well. To this end, he's ordered the formation of a 'working group', consisting of Sec. O'Neill, the Federal Reserve, the S.E.C. among other agencies.

Bottom line? The President has grabbed this bull by the horns and, for all the prattle about political "damage", he's handled this teapot-sized tempest with aplomb, to the chargin of all of the Bush-haters and bashers.

Another thing: If the vengeful Democrats, gung-ho on exacting revenge over Clinton's impeachment, see Enron as Bush's Waterloo, they're in for a crushing disappointment.

Their Enron obsession is understandable, of course: Bush's rock-solid popularity is holding steady, even as their party wallows in disarray and dysfunction. On the other hand, one thing does unite the beltway Democrats like nothing eles: Hate. Their shared hatred of Bush. It's ugly, it's spiteful, it's vile. And it's unseemly. For Bush-haters, it's not enough to disagree with the President: Policy differences must be criminalized.

This is the root of their Enron fixation. But unfortunately for them, Enron won't save them either. Their fanatical putsch will not only fail, it will backfire. The reason is simple: This President has forged a powerful bond with the people, especially in the wake of September 11. There's a chemistry there, one which Democrats, blinded in their hatred, have yet to fathom. This rapport, this wonderful chemistry, this mighty solidarity transcends race, ethnicity, party, religion, gender; Americans of all walks of life see in this humble man, this down-to-earth, straight-talker from Midland someone whom they can trust, someone they can believe in again. His persona embodies the optimism, the idealism, the cheerful self-assurance and confidence which makes us Americans.

America can not -- and will not ever -- say die.

So let the Democrats flail away in their smoldering anger; let them scour, let them probe, let them hound, let them stalk, let them rummage, let them shake their fists at this President: They will only hoist themselves on their own petard.

For America loves George W. Bush -- and nothing's going to change that.

God bless our President, God bless our troops and God bless the United States of America!

My two cents..
"JohnHuang2"


13 posted on 01/11/2002 2:42:27 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
But that's not all. According to the Tribune-Review, Enron and the Clinton-Gore administration were joined at the hip, profiting mutually from their incestuous relationship. Bill Clinton personally opened up many overseas markets for Enron especially, and Enron, in return, introduced Clinton-Gore to the infamous Lippo Industries and John Huang. But there's more -- much more, all of which will now come under the proverbial kleig lights.

Heh heh! Be careful what you ask for 'rats! Here's some more...

Reacting to reports of opposition coming from Maharashtra, U.S. Energy Secretary Hazel O'Leary warned in June that failure to honor the Enron agreement would jeopardize "other private power projects being proposed for international financing." This was interpreted by opponents of the project as an example of U.S. arm twisting. Responding to a warning note that his decision could lead to a multimillion-dollar law suit, Joshi replied: "We are prepared to pay the price to protect the interests of the state and the consumers."

Cancellation of Giant Electrical Project in India Scares U.S. Investors

14 posted on 01/11/2002 2:43:26 AM PST by PogySailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hugh Akston
Hey Waxman- weren't you on Gray Davis' bandwagon demanding that the government cap what Enron could charge California, to stop them from gouging the consumers?

Bump!

15 posted on 01/11/2002 2:43:48 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PogySailor
So, Enron was falsely propped up by favors and coersion from the Clinton administration instead of thriving on its own merit. Now we know how to find other companies on the brink of disaster - companies that never developed true value despite inflated stock prices. Where has Alan Greenspan been?
16 posted on 01/11/2002 2:50:29 AM PST by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
IMHO...there is no *there* there and the Rats know this.....this is an attempt to embarrass GW and drive his poll numbers down.
The Rats and the media are still reeling over the investigations of the rapist and this is nothing more than GOTCHA.

Will it work.....it depends on how GW plays this *game*.....Paul Begala(The Forehead) made a comment the other day...."We Will Crucify Bush Over this"....this is all about 2002 and 2004.

I hope the American people are smarter than this and don't fall for the Rats gameplan.....sigh

God Bless Our Brave Troops

17 posted on 01/11/2002 3:16:23 AM PST by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
Amen to everything you said -- couldn't agree with you more.
18 posted on 01/11/2002 3:19:57 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PogySailor
Bump!
19 posted on 01/11/2002 3:20:40 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
unfortunately most of the american pubic have a short memory due to tv watching. the dems seek to take advantage of lacuna in the community memory and attack the bush administration.
20 posted on 01/11/2002 7:09:03 PM PST by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson