Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Text of presidential proclamation on China trade
ABCNews.com ^ | 12/27/01 | The Associated Press

Posted on 12/27/2001 3:04:11 PM PST by Jean S

CRAWFORD, Texas (AP) Text of President Bush's proclamation Thursday on China's permanent trade status.

1. The United States and the People's Republic of China (China) opened trade relations in 1980. Since that time, the products of China have received nondiscriminatory treatment pursuant to annual waivers of the requirements of section 402 of the Trade Act of 1974 (the "Trade Act") (19 U.S.C. 2432). Trade between the United States and China has expanded significantly even though China has maintained restrictions on market access for U.S. exports and investment.

2. On Nov. 15, 1999, the United States and China agreed on certain terms and conditions for China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) that when implemented will eliminate or greatly reduce the principal barriers to trade and investment in China.

3. On Nov. 9, 2001, pursuant to section 101(b) of Public Law 106-286, 114 Stat. 881, I transmitted a report to the Congress certifying that the terms and conditions for the accession of China to the WTO are at least equivalent to those agreed between the United States and China on Nov. 15, 1999. On Nov. 10, 2001, the Ministerial Conference of the WTO approved the terms and conditions for China's accession and invited China to become a member of the WTO. China has accepted these terms and conditions and became a WTO member on Dec. 11, 2001.

4. Pursuant to section 101(a)(1) of Public Law 106-286, 114 Stat. 881, I hereby determine that chapter 1 of title IV of the Trade Act should no longer apply to China.

Now, therefore, I, George W. Bush, president of the United States of America, acting under the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including but not limited to sections 101(a)(2) and 102(a) of Public Law 106-286, 114 Stat. 881, do hereby proclaim that:

(1) Nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment) shall be extended to the products of China; and

(2) The extension of nondiscriminatory treatment to the products of China shall be effective as of Jan. 1, 2002.

In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of December, in the year of our Lord 2001, and of the independence of the United States of America the 226th.

George W. Bush


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 12/27/2001 3:04:11 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS
From the Michigan Debate Calvin College, 01/11/00

BUSH. ...There are some folks in our country who believe we ought to trade with Cuba. I don't. I think that would be wrong-headed. I think it's be a mistake. Capital that goes into Cuba will be used by the Fidel Castro government to prop itself up. There is a commission-type system in Cuba. Dollars invested will be dollars that will end up supporting this totalitarian regime. It's in our best interests for us to promote freedom in the island right off the coast of Florida. It's in our best interest to keep the pressure on Fidel Castro until he allows free elections, free press and free the prisoners in that island. And for those Americans that believe that trade with Cuba will cause Castro to become less totalitarian, in my judgment are naïve and wrong.

BAUER. Governor, you just made the case for withdrawing most favored nation status from China.

BUSH. I did not.

BAUER. Everything that you just said about Cuba applies to China.

2 posted on 12/27/2001 3:07:23 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl,amom,Yellow Rose of Texas
China Trade Ping
3 posted on 12/27/2001 3:07:25 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Rupert Murdoch will be VERY pleased.
Here is a real eye opener
News Corporation List of Companies, Chairman and Chief Executive: K. Rupert Murdoch
Check the location of Chinabyte.com
Administrative Contact:
Li Wei
Xinnet
Haidian
Beijing Beijing 100044
China
tel: 86 10 68492333
fax: 86 10 68492758
yyang@newscorp.com.cn
FOX NEWS OWNER RUPERT MURDOCH SET FOR CHINA TV CLEARANCE;
MUST ENSURE COMMUNIST CHANNEL WIDELY AVAILABLE IN USA!


China AOL Time Warner and News Corp (aka Fox News) "Deal" - The REAL Story - from China
4 posted on 12/27/2001 3:10:01 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
*Sorry, here is the complete exchange*

From the Michigan Debate Calvin College, 01/11/00

BUSH. ...There are some folks in our country who believe we ought to trade with Cuba. I don't. I think that would be wrong-headed. I think it's be a mistake. Capital that goes into Cuba will be used by the Fidel Castro government to prop itself up. There is a commission-type system in Cuba. Dollars invested will be dollars that will end up supporting this totalitarian regime. It's in our best interests for us to promote freedom in the island right off the coast of Florida. It's in our best interest to keep the pressure on Fidel Castro until he allows free elections, free press and free the prisoners in that island. And for those Americans that believe that trade with Cuba will cause Castro to become less totalitarian, in my judgment are naïve and wrong.

BAUER. Governor, you just made the case for withdrawing most favored nation status from China.

BUSH. I did not.

BAUER. Everything that you just said about Cuba applies to China.

BUSH. May I answer that please?

RUSSERT. Please.

BUSH. There is a huge difference, a huge difference between trading with an entrepreneurial class like that which is growing in China and allowing a Fidel Castro government to skim capital moneys off the top of capital investment. There's a huge difference, a huge difference.

BAUER. Governor, one-third of the trade with China is with companies controlled by the People's Liberation Army.

BUSH. Gary.

BAUER. You know that and I know that. Tell the people rotting in the prisons of China that there's any difference between Castro's Cuba and Communist China. There is none.

BUSH. Let me say this. If we turn our back on the entrepreneurial class that is taking wing in China, we're making a huge mistake. If we turn our back on those that have gotten a whiff of freedom as a result of the marketplace taking hold, we're making a big mistake.

BAUER. Listen, I --

BUSH. We're making a big mistake. We're making a big mistake.

BAUER. The People's Liberation is O.K.?

BUSH. No it's not. I'm talking about the entrepreneurial class that is growing in the country of China.

BAUER. Sir, they are using that money for a massive arms buildup that our sons will have to deal with down the road.

BUSH. Only if you're the president.

BAUER. You can't be tough on China and not on --

BUSH. If I'm the president --

(BOTH TALKING AT ONCE)

RUSSERT. Mr. Bauer. Mr. Bauer, Mr. Bush. Let me move to another area..

5 posted on 12/27/2001 3:12:19 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE,ChaseR
China Trade Ping
6 posted on 12/27/2001 3:12:57 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
From the Drudgereport, "Gertz on Thursday stood by his report, which quoted a senior U.S. official. "A week after the terrorist attack, the ruling Taliban and the al-Qaeda fighters embedded among them, received a shipment of Chinese-made SA-7 missiles," revealed Gertz and Rowan Scarborough in their weekly Inside the Ring report. "

Nice going Mr. President.

7 posted on 12/27/2001 3:27:25 PM PST by baxter999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
China is in WTO. We have to.

Fine. Trade benefits us both.

That said, now bring down the communist regime.

The pieces are in place. The communists do not help China. They do not help us.

Bring down the regime. Support the implementation of a stable government with stability brought about by being part of the international group of civilized trading partners.

8 posted on 12/27/2001 4:00:58 PM PST by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
I will bet many of the "Whiners" here on FR will scream and snivel over this without looking at the "Terms and Conditions" of the agreement. But I remember the same whining and complaining when we put a McDoanald's in the former Soviet Union, and when we signed many trade deals with Gorbachov(sp)?
9 posted on 12/27/2001 4:31:24 PM PST by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
When the Chinese get their hands on some of our superior goods, they will want more, there is a huge movement towards capitalism in China and many companies there have lots of money and would love to have more of our everyday luxuries we have here. This is a good thing, because I have faith that our system is better than theirs and they will want to become more like us, and get away from the oppression they face now.
10 posted on 12/27/2001 4:36:06 PM PST by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Remember!!!..."There is more than one way to skin a cat"
11 posted on 12/27/2001 4:37:44 PM PST by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
That said, now bring down the communist regime.

I think if Castro died or stepped aside or whatever and total chaos emerged in Cuba, the effect on the rest of the world would be minimal.

When the Soviet Union fell apart and basically defaulted in 1998, Long term Capital and the world economy came close to a meltdown.

If China were to enter chaos, the world economy most likely would melt down. I think what Bush and others are trying to engineer is a gradual evolution that eventually caused the communists to lose power, but uncertainty and chaos in China now could be a very bad thing for the world.

12 posted on 12/15/1990 1:41:50 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Jhoffa_
Wow!

1.)Bauer raped Bush in that China/free trade debate!

2.) Bush not only did not learn anything from his a$$ whooping, he put a family friend of Jiang Zhemin's in as labor secretary!

14 posted on 12/29/2001 12:06:59 AM PST by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
Oh yeah.. Bauer zapped him bigtime.

I never saw him so flustered.. He was saying stuff like "Not if I am President.. Only if you are President"

Russert rang the bell and he pulled himself off the ropes right after.

Bauer is a shrewd guy.. He was awesome in that debate.

15 posted on 12/29/2001 12:07:04 AM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: MJY1288
I have faith that our system is better than theirs and they will want to become more like us, and get away from the oppression they face now.

You are a starry eyed pollyanna.

The Chinese people had more freedom in the 1980's and made their wishes known. It happened prior to the fall of the eastern block nations. The difference was the communist regime massacred unarmed citizens with the Army.

If the regime continues much longer the acceptance of the Natonal Socialist system there will take root.

17 posted on 12/29/2001 12:08:19 AM PST by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
If China were to enter chaos, the world economy most likely would melt down.

Nonsense.

If the regime fell there would be no chaos.

The caveat to that is that the communists would try to create as much chaos as possible.

If it came down to it, chaos may be the best thing to happen there.

There is no reason a peaceful transition cannot occur. The only reason it hasn't yet is because the communists have used deadly force on mass scale and at the individual level to stop it from happening.

The longer they hold out, the worse it will be and the more "chaos" there will be.

The argument that the only thing standing between China and chaos is the leadership of the communist party comes from, where else, the communist party.

18 posted on 12/29/2001 12:08:19 AM PST by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: edmund929
BUMP
20 posted on 12/29/2001 12:16:15 AM PST by Wagonmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson