Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia announces cut in oil exports of 150,000 barrels a day
Associated Press ^ | 12/05/2001 4:43 am ET | Associated Press

Posted on 12/05/2001 1:25:47 AM PST by mdittmar

Russia announced Wednesday that it would reduce oil exports by 150,000 barrels a day beginning Jan. 1, in response to OPEC's calls for production cuts to help stabilize petroleum prices.

The announcement followed an earlier decision to reduce oil production and exports by 50,000 barrels a day for the rest of the year, a cut criticized as too small to affect prices. The larger cut was likely to go a long away toward satisfying the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.

Stanislav Naumov, a spokesman for Deputy Prime Minister Viktor Khristenko, said no time limit had been set for the cut, which had been agreed on at a meeting between Prime Minister Mikhail Kasyanov and the heads of Russian oil companies.

Russia, the world's second-largest oil producer, has a total production of 7 million barrels a day.

Global oil prices have plummeted nearly 30 percent in recent months, and OPEC implored Russia to join other nonmember nations such as Mexico and Norway in making larger cuts to help shore up prices.

OPEC, which produces approximately 40 percent of the world's oil, has cut production by 3.5 million barrels a day so far this year.

The 11-member cartel agreed Nov. 14 to further reduce output by 1.5 million barrels a day as of Jan. 1 on condition that non-OPEC members agree to cuts amounting to 500,000 barrels a day.

Norway already has agreed to reduce production by 100,000 to 200,000 barrels a day, while Mexico has promised to cut its production by 100,000 barrels a day.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: geopolitics; russianmafia; warlist
Better run out and buy one of those "Segways".
1 posted on 12/05/2001 1:25:47 AM PST by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
By cutting 150,000, Russia is reducing production by about 2%. That doesn't sound like much, especially compared to Norway and Mexico, who are cutting comparable amounts off of already lower total production. But I'm not an expert, and small changes can lead to big price swings in some commodities. However, I was reading (here on FR, I think) about a week ago that the Russian oil industry is a very private, free-enterprise operation. Almost none of the production is under direct government control. The production companies are probably parts of an association, but I doubt that anyone has effective power to enforce production limits in Russia. They need money and will sell every barrel they can extract.
2 posted on 12/05/2001 1:48:11 AM PST by Stirner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
From It Is Time to Declare War by Leonard Peikoff
Fifty years ago, Truman and Eisenhower surrendered the West's property rights in oil, although that oil rightfully belonged to those in the West whose science, technology, and capital made its discovery and use possible. The first country to nationalize a Western oil company, in 1951, was Iran. The rest, observing our frightened silence, hurried to grab off their piece of the newly available loot.

If America is not going to take back what is rightfully ours in the Middle East, then at least we should open up our own soil to exploration and production. But thanks to Traitor Lott, it looks like that is not going to happen:

Senate GOP gives up on energy vote

Of course, maybe the price of gasoline needs to get back to $2 per gallon before the cowards and traitors in the senate will release their death-grip on domestic oil production.

3 posted on 12/05/2001 2:04:25 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
I have never and will never understand this. Why the hell do we let one cartel literally determine our economic future? I just don't get it. We should have been free from the chains of foreign oil decade ago.
4 posted on 12/05/2001 2:13:18 AM PST by paul544
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stirner
Maybe the US should start cutting "aid" funds for these countries by the same amounts?
5 posted on 12/05/2001 3:04:51 AM PST by zandtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Gee - that was a brief alliance.
6 posted on 12/05/2001 5:22:33 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

THINK HIROSHIMA

-- think fast!
7 posted on 12/05/2001 11:56:52 AM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stirner
Wrong.

Yes, this does not sound like much on the surface. But it is the very amount that will turn an alliance of both OPEC and non OPEC producers around to jeapardize everything including the war on terrorism.

On Nov 12th: OPEC, in a last-minute lobbying effort before its members meet in Vienna Wednesday to discuss production cuts, is attempting to convince non-OPEC producers such as Russia, Norway and Mexico to cut output by 500,000 barrels a day. Saudi Arabia, OPEC's heavyweight and the world's largest exporter, has proposed the cartel cut its own output by 1.5 million barrels a day.

It then looked like that might not happen thnaks to Russia even though Mexico tried to coax Russia in Vienna into the price hike.

-- During a time of war!

So, now with the just-opened Caspian oil pipeline the Russians want to play the role of OPEC themselves, perhaps.

Russia -- you are either with us or the terrorists.

It looks like Russia just voted for the terrorists.

8 posted on 12/05/2001 12:18:04 PM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
I feared this would happen.

The US, Russia, Norway, Mexico, Kazakstan, Canada, and Turkmenistan need to form our own oil organization. Sell it for half the price of OPEC oil, but only to countries that boycott OPEC.

If it were to happen, the UK, Japan, and Australia would jump on board rather quickly, while the EU rots.

9 posted on 12/05/2001 12:54:40 PM PST by jae471
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
"Carefully calculated." as in chess.
10 posted on 12/05/2001 2:01:19 PM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flamefront; *Geopolitics; *war_list; *Russian Mafia; Sawdring; Askel5; It'salmosttolate; Zadokite
Outrageous. During a time of war!

You thought oil prices were to go down?
First humor Bush in Crawford where nuclear weapons are promised a cut by 2/3rds; then open the Caspian pipeline; and then go along with OPEC policy inimical to the U.S.

11 posted on 12/05/2001 2:24:51 PM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
It's a sad state of affairs when you can't help admiring the way the "former" commies clean the clocks of our deadeyed capitalists.

What a bunch of chumps.

12 posted on 12/05/2001 2:40:15 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: paul544
I have never and will never understand this. Why the hell do we let one cartel literally determine our economic future? I just don't get it. We should have been free from the chains of foreign oil decade ago.

If it weren't for the 'Enviro-wackos', who think that gas magically comes from a pump and electricity magically comes from these handy holes in the wall, we could have been free from depending on foreign oil. We could tell the Arabs to take their oil and shove it, because we could use our own. We can't drill for oil, because of the enormous amounts of environmental regulations.

Maybe it's not so bad elsewhere in the USA, but it's really bad here in California. The last oil refinery built here was in 1976, and I know that more than one have shut down since then. In other words, We can't even build oil refineries to refine what we buy from the Arabs.

As long as we can't produce or refine our own oil, we will remain shackled to those who do.

13 posted on 12/05/2001 6:20:19 PM PST by Orion78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
War On Terrorism: Diplomacy - US and Russia on verge of deal over oil and missiles

"RUSSIA AND the United States may be on the verge of a strategic and diplomatic grand bargain over missile defence, oil and Nato, as part of an extraordinary rapprochement made possible by the transformation of the international scene since 11 September."

14 posted on 12/05/2001 6:33:02 PM PST by Orion78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson