Posted on 10/22/2001 10:06:32 AM PDT by Red Dawn
I don't really want to start another thread on the Middle Eastern Men buying huge quantities of candy at Costco, but I haven't seen this perspective brought up yet, and would llke a few thoughts on the matter.
It would be very easy to buy a few hundred dollars worth here and there if their intention was to spread smallpox among the kids. It would certainly be inconspicuous.
Buying such large quantities though would surely suggest something far more sinister. My thinking is that if all this is true and not just another urban rumor, their intention was possibly to infect then "donate" this candy to large organizations such as Red Cross, United Way, Unicef, etc.
This way, the gov would have been responsible for our own destruction, and Osama and the boys could have a good laugh while celebrating Ramadan.
I would be surprised if such organizations have ever taken candy as donations even before 9/11, let alone now.
Here's a question: We know the profile of our domestic enemies in this battle: Arabic, age 15-50, fluent in English, male, likely NOT a citizen.
How many of these folks can there be? 100,000?
"It would be very easy to buy a few hundred dollars worth here and there if their intention was to spread smallpox among the kids. It would certainly be inconspicuous.Buying such large quantities though would surely suggest something far more sinister. My thinking is that if all this is true and not just another urban rumor, their intention was possibly to infect then "donate" this candy to large organizations such as Red Cross, United Way, Unicef, etc."
I've been on the other threads, and I think your concern is sound... Once the idea of contaminating Halloween candy with a highly infectious disease surfaces, you have to wonder how many smaller purchases are slipping under the radar.
The purchases aren't mere "urban legend," however.
Check snopes.com and Large candy purchases investigated by FBI .
The concern is not that terrorists would distribute the infected candy directly, but sneak it back onto store shelves as happened in the poison Tylenol case during the 80s.
For more on the feasibility of this, a doctor posted this thread yesterday...
Also, bags could have been donated to schools, churches, the Salvation Army, etc.
I don't really know what's happening with this, but the FBI has a man in custody at this moment.
Anybody think the idea was to plain old donate the candy? or the guy owns one or more stores (or sells to people who do). Don't people often buy wholesale for small businesses at costco? and how much candy did he buy?
Native Americans were given blankets that had been used by smallpox victims in what was possibly history's first deliberate use of biological weapons. Textiles can be infected and the smallpox virus will remain infectious on the textile for months. This is a genuine and credible threat -- IF they have gotten possession of some live smallpox virus. I would consider this to be a more credible scenario than the candy route that has been extensively discussed here.
Check the links on #8.
It would be very easy to buy a few hundred dollars worth here and there if their intention was to spread smallpox among the kids. It would certainly be inconspicuous.It's now many days later - and we find out we escaped without any MAJOR incidents occurring ... despite stories and reports indicating the deadly peril that lay in wait for us and all our children in the way tainted Costco candy ...
All was found to be OK. Nobody was poisoned. Nobody has been poisoned. See post #18 in this thread and the link it refers to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.