[Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America]

There are only two choices: 1) Euthanize the disabled, or 2) Subsidize the disabled using government funds (taxes).

I sincerely believe that in the case of the disabled, it is morally incumbent upon us to support them through government subsidies. Don't all Americans pay into disability, anyway?

[KC_Lion]

The Progressives have had the same idea since the beginning.

Lebensunwertes Leben

[blueunicorn6]

“While libertarians - who don’t share their admiration for the Constitution” Yep, but they sure do admire money.

[Erik Latranyi]

Benefits for the disabled are far less objectionable than those we currently pay to the people I see in grocery store lines and convenience stores.

[ravenwolf]

I don,t see anything wrong with Government funding to support the disabled but Government funding should be set up for that purpose.

Many people get disability already but i do not recollect paying taxes for that specific purpose.

We pay social security tax so that we can start collecting the benefits at an age when many get to where they can not do much work and also tax for medicare.

We could do the same thing as far as disabilty is concerned.

But the idea of a general fund for the socialists in Government to do what ever they want to do with, doling out to unwed mothers and lazy asses and dope adicts and a thousand other thing is why this country is hitting rock bottem in the first place.

[Tax-chick]

Nice as it sounds to have government pay for the care of “the disabled,” the problem is that you end up with what we have now: a proliferation of recipients whose “disability” is a lifestyle choice, and death panels for the truly helpless.

[SandRat]

Say hello to tbi!!!! The Unspoken of Injury/Wound.