Replies

As is typical for Paulbots, you are erecting a strawman to attack. No surprise, integrity is not one of Paul's strong points nor one of his idolators.

No, actually my preference is for someone who is sane. My preference is for someone with a small degree of integrity, honesty, and who knows the difference between China or Iran, and the United States. Someone who doesn't see the Red Chinese and the Imams of Iran as being morally equal to Americans and the Israelis. Someone who has even a remote comprehension of the threat a nuclear armed Iran is to Israel, the US, and the world's economy.

My preference is for someone who is not a biggoted anti-semite, Nazi lover.

But Sanity is the very minimum, and Paul doesn't come close--nor do his supporting robots.

Not a "Paulbot", but knock yourself out. And you're just harping on foreign policy, which will mean jack shit this election to me and a whole bunch of others. In every area except that one, Paul is by far the best candidate*. And even in that area, he at least deserves to be listened to. There's a pretty warped belief seemingly permeating this site that he's somehow a Blame America First candidate, when he is in fact an America First candidate. Most Republicans used to be America First, but not anymore, it seems. Et tu, Brute?

*) With the exception of Sarah Palin of course - who I am still in some warped way hoping for. Brokered convention, anyone?