Replies

Yes, Cain, Palin, Bachmann, et al, would do better on a budget. Why? In Palins case, because she had to set them and stick to them while governor, and Cain, because of his extensive business background. Paul is a hack, who says one thing and does another...he has been doing this for 30 years while pulling the wool over people’s eyes. Besides, he was just appointed as Head of the Monetary sub-committee...this gives him the power to do the things he wants (audit the Fed, etc). Why would he want to give this up for a diminished leadership role as President?

Just look on this site a 2012’s for ethanol...you will see his support for the T. Boone Pickens boondoggle, and his “explanation” for this support.

Cain, Palin, Bachmann, et al, would do better on a budget.

Cain? Federal Reserve employee. Palin? Bridge to nowhere. Bachman? I like her, but don't know enough. Re: Ron Paul supporting ethanol, show me a cite. I will look at it happily - so far I respect your responses. If you don't like my one sentence responses to Cain and Palin, then keep in mind statements regarding Paul.

One other question - which departments do Cain, Palin, Bachman,et al, favor defunding? Any? If not, does that disappoint you? Are they not following the constitution?