[Presto]

UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide,

That is not an argument against the specific merits of this Amendment proposal. That sounds like an argument that the Constitution itself is not longer operable law. I can’t agree.

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

That sounds like an argument that the Constitution itself is not longer operable law. I can’t agree.

It isn't.

Wickard v Filburn is. (interstate commerce)

Roe v Wade is. (insert "privacy")

KELO is. (public purpose)

It is just a game for the left.

Remember the "balanced budget" Constitution Amendment alternative offered by Democrats about 7 years ago that exempted "Social Security"? Everybody else said in unison that would only have resulted in the "Social Security Agricultural Subsidy" bill, the "Social Security Food Stamps" bill, yadda yadda yadda.

Nothing but a word game when people have no respect for the principles.