[jude24]

Oh, the ones on this board? If not, then do you think it is right for you to vent at them?

FTD and his cabal of KJV-legalists use the same, tired arguments that deceived me 8 years ago.

If you are not one of his number, I apologize. Your initial statement to me caused me to conclude otherwise.

I have no problem with the KJV, as far as it goes. It's a remarkably good translation. My quarrel is with those who would force Christians to use the KJV even when they struggle to understand it. I object to the slander of godly men by the KJV-legalist cabal. The historical revisionism rampant in the KJV-legalist position blows my mind.

[ksen]

My quarrel is with those who would force Christians to use the KJV even when they struggle to understand it. I object to the slander of godly men by the KJV-legalist cabal. The historical revisionism rampant in the KJV-legalist position blows my mind.

Both sides of this argument should have quarrels with those who slander godly men, whether they stand by the KJV or not.

Also, I am aware that my side is a little free with the facts for which I apologize. The things I present I try to make sure of first.

[editor-surveyor]

" My quarrel is with those who would force Christians to use the KJV even when they struggle to understand it."

You have set yourself in opposition to God's word, and the Holy Spirit with this deliberately misleading statement.

No one led by the Holy Spirit 'struggles with' the Word.

Yor self-important arrogance is staggering.