Unfortunately it is not
This post is also for you also, 'mom'!
The true comfort of Calvinism, the whip, the sword and the stake. This is beneath you, ftD,
Funny how it is not 'beneath' a Calvinist to deny that Calvin was responsible for the death of not only Servetus, but others in Geneva.
Funny, how it is not 'beneath' a Calvinist to defend the burning at the stake of a man who pleaded for mercy.
Where were the cries of outrage from the Calvinist 'brethren' when Dr. Steve called me a liar and a liabler for stating an historical fact.
Where the honest Calvinists when OP was stating that Servetus deserved what he got!
Where were the objective Calvinists when I was asking why Dr. Steve was asking about a believers personal life and what that had to do with his theology.
Where are the Calvinist brethren when a brother in Christ is being attacked as a tare, an unbeliever etc.
When your Reformed history is put out for the world to see, the beatings, the hangings and the burnings then comes the outrage!
Knox's tirade shows that if the Reformed churches had had as much power as Rome, they would have behaved no differently.
The silence of the Calvinists on these threads when fellow believers are vilified is proof that they would sit quietly by while it happened.