Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Faithful Catholics Returning to Humane Vitae?
The Annual Catholic Directory Years 1944-2003 | 7/10/03 | Me

Posted on 07/10/2003 7:10:39 PM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker

Year Infant Baptisms Marriages Cuumlative Baptisms Cummulative Baptism Cummulative Baptisms/Marriage Annual Baptism/Marriage Ratio of Catholics Married In Church
1943 722434 289548 4699880 3.14 2.45 1.12
1944 710648 249140 14770410 4725321 3.26 2.83 1.17
1945 705557 245261 15404338 4796173 3.34 2.88 1.21
1946 705557 245261 16012434 4870393 3.42 3.01 1.18
1947 738314 345772 16659248 4937943 3.49 2.62 1.13
1948 907294 394593 17243217 4903826 3.60 2.38 0.90
1949 937208 373191 17658238 4838683 3.73 2.53 0.82
1950 943443 338512 18031443 4817950 3.81 2.88 0.78
1951 973544 328317 18362938 4836438 3.84 3.10 0.72
1952 1018303 319846 18580236 4869050 3.84 3.37 0.67
1953 1077184 303444 18701181 4920359 3.80 3.61 0.63
1954 1094872 303187 18719169 5022707 3.73 3.83 0.63
1955 1161304 313652 18711155 5136791 3.63 3.84 0.60
1956 1204982 324907 18638314 5249448 3.52 3.95 0.59
1957 1284534 325249 18488265 5341465 3.40 4.02 0.54
1958 1307666 314989 18178802 5431703 3.27 4.27 0.53
1959 1344576 319992 17787700 5523622 3.14 4.11 0.51
1960 1313653 319481 17319430 5588659 3.02 4.23 0.53
1961 1352371 312811 16900769 5638311 2.91 4.23 0.51
1962 1322283 311655 16433323 5677977 2.82 4.24 0.52
1963 1322315 329450 16001717 5707651 2.73 3.98 0.51
1964 1310413 352458 15575553 5718690 2.65 3.62 0.52
1965 1274938 357000 15175646 5711753 2.60 3.34 0.53
1966 1190842 360929 14844340 5705498 2.57 3.16 0.56
1967 1139248 371155 14636084 5697944 2.54 2.95 0.57
1968 1095172 405792 14461885 5674234 2.53 2.68 0.58
1969 1086858 417271 14341730 5616415 2.53 2.61 0.56
1970 1088463 426309 14202540 5545117 2.54 2.47 0.56
1971 1054933 416924 14067400 5467108 2.55 2.34 0.57
1972 975071 415487 13954365 5392624 2.58 2.21 0.59
1973 916564 406908 13917241 5318759 2.62 2.15 0.60
1974 876306 385029 13946980 5248766 2.69 2.32 0.61
1975 894992 369133 14115008 5205093 2.76 2.40 0.60
1976 884925 352477 14367992 5172605 2.83 2.53 0.58
1977 890677 341329 14663774 5152596 2.90 2.63 0.54
1978 896151 340489 14966219 5137056 2.94 2.67
1979 910506 345521 15106117 5111954 2.98 2.73
1980 943632 350745 15225305 5071818 3.02 2.80
1981 982586 353375 15310954 5023992 3.06 2.73
1982 965049 347445 15372672 4971199 3.11 2.81
1983 975017 347973 15448460 4912347 3.15 2.72
1984 947668 345973 15486880 4838074 3.22 2.76
1985 953323 348300 15561226 4759618 3.29 2.70
1986 941898 342440 15639146 4680352 3.36 2.74
1987 937947 341622 15704964 4594475 3.43 2.77
1988 946303 336915 15772507 3.10
1989 1044334 341356 3.36
1990 1147976 336645 3.51
1991 1180707 332468 3.59
1992 1193122 325789 3.18
1993 1036049 315387 3.26
1994 1029694 305385 3.37
1995 1029281 302919 3.45
1996 1044304 300582 3.46
1997 1040837 288593 3.51
1998 1013437 273700 3.73
1999 1022014 267517 3.85
2000 1031243 269034 3.75
2001 1007716 256563 3.92
2002 1005490 241727

The data above are from the Annual Catholic Directory of the United States and Canada. The data is for all American Catholic dioceses, including the eastern rite jurisdictions.

Column 1 is the year of the data (the data for the previous year appears in the Catholic Directory of any given year).
Column 2 is the number of Baptisms for that year.
Column 3 is the number of Marriages for that year.
Column 4 is a 15 year moving total of Baptisms.
Column 5 is a 15 year moving total of Marriages.
Column 6 is the ratio of Column 4 to the previous years Column 5.
Column 7 is the ratio of Column 2 to the previous years Column 3.
Column 8 is the ratio of twice Column 2 25 years later to Column 1 of that year.



TOPICS: Catholic; History; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Religion & Science
KEYWORDS: baptism; birthcontrol; catholiclist; contraception; humanevitae; marriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
My comments on this data are below.

I assumed an average 15 year fertile period for each Marriage beginning one year after the Marriage assuming an age at Marriage of approximately 25.

The moving totals are shown adjacent to the first year within them.

The ratio of the moving totals of Infant Baptisms and Marriages is an indicator of total Catholic fertility for a given year. The peak years of faithfulness to Catholic teaching on Birth Control are clearly the people married in the years 1943 to 1960 and then beginning in 1980 through 1987, which is the latest year possible for the 15 year moving total.

By the one year ratio, it appears that the peak years of births relative to marriages occuring is 1953 to 1964, and then a sudden renewal in the period 1998 to present, which can only be attributed to a sudden at least partial return to the mores of the generation prior to the Baby Boom, because as the number of marriages has plummeted since 1990 by around 30%, the number of Baptisms has held steady. The only conclusion possible is that young Catholic families today are having more children.

These trends would be even more striking if the enormous number of annulments in America since 1970 were accounted for in the moving total of Marriage statistics. With Ordinary Process Annulments running at around 40,000 per year for many years now, assuming just half of those occur among people of childbearing age would result in a running 15 year reduction in the roles of the Married by 300,000, boosting the Baptisms per Marriage number by 7%. Increasing the current ratios by that amount would put the numbers back to the hieghts reached during the Baby Boom.

It is also clear from these numbers that the memories of those pining away for the good old days of the 1950's are faulty. It is impossible that the majority of Catholic families then had 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and more chidren, because there simply are not enough number of Baptisms recorded to support that. In fact, careful personal reflection by these people, and by younger people with regard to older families they know, should show this clearly to be false. The typical Catholic family at that time would probably have been 4 to 5 children. The trend today appears to be heading back in that direction.

This unremarked positive phenomenon is nearly universal in European lands also. For example, France, Lithuania, Germany, Switzerland, and the Czech Republic are now averaging around 3.3 Baptisms per Catholic Marriage in 2003. Ireland and Leichentenstein are averaging around 3.5 Baptisms per Marriage. The Netherlands, Austria, and Belgium are averaging around 3.75 Baptisms per Marriage. Luxmbourg is averaging close to an amazing 4.5 Baptisms per Marriage. The only major sad cases are Italy, averaging just 2, and Spain and Portugal, averaging somewhat more than 2. Mitigating this is the extreme faithfulness of those in Italy who are having Children - nearly every child Baptised is making it through confirmation, unlike in the US, where trends are that 40% never make it to Confirmation.

By way of comparison, the Phillipines, which is widely held out as a model of faithfulness to Church teaching, is averaging about 5 Baptisms per Marriage. The West is closing this gap!

The sudden break with Catholic practice is clear enough in the data in 1968. Intriguing thoough is the equally sudden apparent return starting in 1988 going quickly from 2.7 to 3.5 Baptisms per Marriage in three years, and then again starting in 1998 climbing towards 4.0 with no end in sight.

Also interesting is a check of how many are marrying in the Catholic Church, shown in Column 8. Taking the Marriage figure for any given year, doubling it, and comparing it to the Baptism figure 25 years previous gives a good rough idea of how many people are getting Married in the Church. For those born through 1949 (marred in 1974 on average), the ideal of all being Married in the Church is clearly present. After that, catastrophe strikes, with around 40% of all Catholics marrying outside the Church. Worse, the number of mixed Marriages is about 30% of the total, so the number is really closer to 50% or slightly under of Catholics marrying within the Church. Recent trends in this show no improvement - the seperation of the tares from the wheat in the Fields of the Lord is continuing. And the data also strongly imply a complete breakdown in Catholic education's effectiveness beginning with those starting school around 1959.

1 posted on 07/10/2003 7:10:39 PM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Loyalist; ultima ratio; Salvation; sinkspur; NYer; Desdemona; american colleen; Patrick Madrid; ...
Any pings would be appreciated for discussion of this data I'm bringing forth.
2 posted on 07/10/2003 7:13:39 PM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Your Donation Helps Counter These Guys

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 07/10/2003 7:14:40 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
thanks, do you have a link?
4 posted on 07/10/2003 7:18:59 PM PDT by Coleus (God is Pro Life and Straight and gave an innate predisposition for self-preservation and protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Akron Al; Alberta's Child; Aloysius; AniGrrl; Antoninus; Bellarmine; BlackElk; ...
I think you can explain this seeming growth in marital fecundity amongst American Catholics solely by the growing numbers of Hispanics in the United States.

I would bet that outmarriage among the rest of American Catholics is continuing to rise, and births and marriages continuing to fall.
5 posted on 07/10/2003 7:22:16 PM PDT by Loyalist (When she gets back from Vancouver....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; ...
`
6 posted on 07/10/2003 7:22:26 PM PDT by Coleus (God is Pro Life and Straight and gave an innate predisposition for self-preservation and protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker; *Catholic_list; father_elijah; nickcarraway; SMEDLEYBUTLER; Siobhan; ...
ping

Interesting data.
7 posted on 07/10/2003 7:22:42 PM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
I married outside the Catholic Church. Heck, I was outside the Catholic Church when I got married. But my wife recently converted at 52 and somehow the road led me back to where I came from some time ago.

My granddaughter starts Catholic School this fall.

8 posted on 07/10/2003 7:26:59 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
Great find, man. I can tell you have been wearing your Freeper beanie.
9 posted on 07/10/2003 7:42:29 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
No link. I copied the data out of the books at St. Charles Borromeo Seminary in Philly.
10 posted on 07/10/2003 7:43:01 PM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Good point. However, a large number of Hispanics are also faithless.
11 posted on 07/10/2003 7:44:21 PM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
"Worse, the number of mixed Marriages is about 30% of the total"

My marriage was a mixed marriage when we got married. Why is that bad?
12 posted on 07/10/2003 7:44:25 PM PDT by ACAC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
because as the number of marriages has plummeted since 1990 by around 30%, the number of Baptisms has held steady. The only conclusion possible is that young Catholic families today are having more children.

I see a very obvious alternate conclusion: a higher percentage of children being baptized are illegitimate. This conclusion has the advantage of being supported by your data, and by generally available data about trends in society.

13 posted on 07/10/2003 7:46:29 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
Wow, thanks for your effort in this matter..Job well done.

How did you get everything to align?
14 posted on 07/10/2003 7:50:32 PM PDT by Coleus (God is Pro Life and Straight and gave an innate predisposition for self-preservation and protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ACAC
My marriage was a mixed marriage when we got married. Why is that bad?

Pope Pius XI explains in his encyclical Casti Connubii:

They, therefore, who rashly and heedlessly contract mixed marriages, from which the maternal love and providence of the Church dissuades her children for very sound reasons, fail conspicuously in this respect, sometimes with danger to their eternal salvation. This attitude of the Church to mixed marriages appears in many of her documents, all of which are summed up in the Code of Canon Law: "Everywhere and with the greatest strictness the Church forbids marriages between baptized persons, one of whom is a Catholic and the other a member of a schismatical or heretical sect; and if there is, add to this, the danger of the falling away of the Catholic party and the perversion of the children, such a marriage is forbidden also by the divine law."[62] If the Church occasionally on account of circumstances does not refuse to grant a dispensation from these strict laws (provided that the divine law remains intact and the dangers above mentioned are provided against by suitable safeguards), it is unlikely that the Catholic party will not suffer some detriment from such a marriage.

Whence it comes about not unfrequently, as experience shows, that deplorable defections from religion occur among the offspring, or at least a headlong descent into that religious indifference which is closely allied to impiety. There is this also to be considered that in these mixed marriages it becomes much more difficult to imitate by a lively conformity of spirit the mystery of which We have spoken, namely that close union between Christ and His Church.

Assuredly, also, will there be wanting that close union of spirit which as it is the sign and mark of the Church of Christ, so also should be the sign of Christian wedlock, its glory and adornment. For, where there exists diversity of mind, truth and feeling, the bond of union of mind and heart is wont to be broken, or at least weakened. From this comes the danger lest the love of man and wife grow cold and the peace and happiness of family life, resting as it does on the union of hearts, be destroyed.


15 posted on 07/10/2003 7:56:47 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Isn't illegitimacy going down now though? How likely is it also that illegitimate children are making it to the Baptismal font with 50-60% of all Catholics are falling away and marrying outside the Church, thus depriving their children of all the sacraments?

However, that is another valid explanation, which I would accept as possible accounting for some, but not all, of the increase.

16 posted on 07/10/2003 7:57:33 PM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ACAC
"Worse, the number of mixed Marriages is about 30% of the total"

My marriage was a mixed marriage when we got married. Why is that bad?

Well, you are taking that in the wrong sense. I was saying, "worse yet, when you consider the number of mixed Marriages, the number of Catholics marrying inside the Church is even lower, because non-Catholic marriage partners mean even fewer Catholics marrying within the Church."

However, in general, mixed Marriages do not work out, and Catholic Tradition discourages and forbids them. For every sucess story there are more failures, because of religious friction. And frequently, when they do "succeed", the parents and children drop out of Church to create peace in the family.

The ideal for two people of disparate cult who are in love would be for one of them to convert prior to the marriage, especially if one of them is not Baptised.

17 posted on 07/10/2003 8:03:00 PM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
Dear Hermann,

I made the observation perhaps a year ago that it seemed to me that there was a new openness to the teaching on contraception.

In my own parish, there are certain many folks contracepting away. But ten years ago, folks didn't even take the discussion seriously. Now, when my wife gets together with church friends, it isn't unusual to find two or three in a group of five or seven have abandoned artificial contraception (or even better, never used it in the first place), and the rest are open to hear of these experiences. Having grown up during the period when nearly all Catholics in the US rejected this teaching (I'd never met anyone who took the church's teaching seriously until I was in high school), it is a little shocking to my ears to hear these young ladies openly asking questions, expressing interest and even wonderment.

The trend is especially pronounced with the younger women (My wife and I are sort of "old" for our group, in that children didn't arrive with us until we were in our mid-30s. So, since friends often come with one's children, many of my wife's friends are ten or more years younger than us.)

In the last ten years, it's been heartening to see folks in our parish who have had four, five, seven, nine, ten children. It's been heartening to see someone you met when they had maybe one or two, and now they have six or seven.


sitetest
18 posted on 07/10/2003 8:04:57 PM PDT by sitetest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist; maximillian
If the data is the result of Hispanic influx, or illegitimacy, why is the Baptism per Marriage figure flat for 1968 through 1988, the period when these two trends exploded?
19 posted on 07/10/2003 8:05:52 PM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian; ACAC
If the Church occasionally on account of circumstances does not refuse to grant a dispensation from these strict laws (provided that the divine law remains intact and the dangers above mentioned are provided against by suitable safeguards), it is unlikely that the Catholic party will not suffer some detriment from such a marriage.

"Occasionally"? The Church FREQUENTLY granted dispensations, even in Pius XI's day. But, Pius XI's condemnation (that is what it is) caused good people like my parents to be married in the rectory of Annunciation Church in Houston in 1944. My father later converted to Catholicism, in spite of this humiliation, and mom and dad died, 48 years later, within a year of each other, still married.

ACAC, as long as you and your spouse are aware of the issues involved in marriages involving two people of different faiths, there's nothing "bad" about your marriage.

Max, you know very well that the Church's attitude toward mixed marriages has changed, significantly. That's for the better.

20 posted on 07/10/2003 8:07:40 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson