See, thats where Wesley gets into trouble. Nothing wrong with "Mankind is unable to make the slightest move towards Christ" where the trouble begins is with the word "first". "First" implies a "second", and when a "second" is in man's hands then what you are getting back to is the doctrine of a helpless God who pines away hoping and wishing that man would do something right.
All of this wishful thinking that man somehow is the ultimate authority, still is a anthropocentric religion that makes man sovereign in matters of salvation.
What is the ground and 'nature' (extent) of this Salvation?
?.....partial or total.....Salvation?
I thought you were joking. Salvation is either "total" or it isn't "salvation". I would love to hear what distinguishes hypothetical "partial" salvation from "total". Is "partial" a salvation where God only teases someone? Otherwise, you got me here. (scratching head)
?.....What part of 'Salvation' is NOT a Gift???