Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: man of Yosemite
I am questioning whether this type of priesthood is not very similar to the priesthood of Judaism, which priesthood was no longer necessary when Christ was made a high priest forever after the order of Melchisadek. The scriptures mention elders and bishops as overseers to the church, but I'm not sure they had any intention of creating the type of priesthood now practiced in Catholicism.

In 2 Chronicles 19:11 and Malachi 2:7 there is evidence of the living continuing authority of the Mosaic priesthood. Isaiah in Chapter 22:20-25 makes a very interesting prophecy. His oracle states there will be an abolition of the Old Testament high priests and the establishment of a new priesthood of the House of David. This priesthood is very specific however.

On that day I will summon my servant Eliakim (means loyal to God), son of Hilkiah; I will clothe him with your robe, and gird him with your sash, and give over to him your authority. He shall be a father to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and to the house of Judah. I will place the key of the House of David on his shoulder; when he opens, no one shall shut, when he shuts, no one shall open.......etc.

Very interesting. It sounds like a passage in the New Testament.

Matthew 16:18-19 I for my part declare to you, you are 'Rock', and on this rock I will build my church, and the jaws of death shall not prevail against it. I will entrust to you the keys of the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you declare bound on earth shall be bound in heaven; whatever you declare loosed on earth shall be loosed in heaven."

But, none of this went into effect before Christ's death. In fact, when Jesus admonishes the scribes and Pharisees for their hypocrisy he still acknowledges their priestly authority (Matthew 23:1-3). The Old Testament sacrifice, ritual and law was in effect until it was replaced by the NT Sacrifice on the Cross. With the New Covenant came a new priesthood. The Commission of the Apostles in Matthew 28 and Pentecost began their priesthood (also Mark 16, Luke 24:44-49,John 20:22-23, Acts 2).

In Acts Chapter 1 there is direct mention of the special apostolic office and ministry which has been established: May another take his office and again in verses 24-25, Make known to us which of these two you choose for this apostolic ministry, replacing Judas, who deserted the cause and went the way he was destined to go. This directly says the Apostles knew their position was an office and set apart from other believers.

In Acts 6 they recognize the need for assistants due to the growth of the Christian community. This is the first example (of many) I can find of the Apostolic transmission of Holy Orders to earthly men: They presented these men to the apostles, who first prayed over them and then imposed hands on them. The word of God continued to spread, while at the same time the number of the disciples in Jerusalem enormously increased. There were many priests among those who embraced the faith.

Acts also makes it clear that Peter and the apostles no longer submit to the authority of the Jewish Sanhedrin.

19 posted on 05/26/2003 5:33:38 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Canticle_of_Deborah
Thanks for the info. The apostles always said that they had apostolic authority. I don't see them using the title of priest, and those who were mentioned as priests were believers which came out of the Levitical priesthood and were still jealous of the Law. These people stirred up much anger towards Paul and wanted the gentile converts to be circumcised.
20 posted on 05/26/2003 11:29:33 PM PDT by man of Yosemite ("When a man decides to do something everyday, that's about when he stops doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson