Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHY MOTHER TERESA SHOULD NOT BE A SAINT
mirror.co.uk ^ | Jan. 13, 2003 | Christopher Hitchens

Posted on 01/13/2003 9:34:12 PM PST by Nachum

In the good old/bad old days, the procedure for making a former human being into a saint was well understood.

There had to be an interval of at least seven years after the death before beatification - the first stage in the process - could even be proposed. (This was to insure against any gusts of popular enthusiasm for a local figure who might later prove to be a phoney.)

There had to be proof of two miracles, attributable to the intercession of the deceased.

And there had to be a hearing, at which the advocatus Diaboli, or Devil's Advocate, would be appointed by the Church to make the strongest possible case against the nominee.

I am not a Roman Catholic and the saint-making procedures of the Vatican are really none of my business. But it strikes me as odd that none of the above rules have been followed in the case of the newly-beatified woman who called herself "Mother" Teresa of Calcutta.

She was first put forward for beatification only four years after her death. Only one miracle has been required of her, and duly found to have been performed.

And, instead of appointing a Devil's Advocate, the Vatican invited me to be a witness for the Evil One, and expected me to do the job pro bono.

Their reason for asking was that I made a documentary called Hell's Angel, and wrote a short book entitled The Missionary Position, in which I reviewed Mother Teresa's career as if she had been an ordinary person.

I discovered that she had taken money from rich dictators like the Duvalier gang in Haiti, had been a friend of poverty rather than a friend of the poor, had never given any account of the huge sums of money donated to her, had railed against birth-control in the most overpopulated city on the planet and had been the spokeswoman for the most extreme dogmas of religious fundamentalism.

Actually, it's boasting to say that I "discovered" any of this. It was all there in plain sight for anyone to notice. But in the age of celebrity, nobody had troubled to ask if such a global reputation was truly earned or was simply the result of brilliant public relations.

"Wait a minute," said a TV host in Washington a few nights ago, when I debated all this with Mr John Donahue of the Catholic Defence League. "She built hospitals." No, sir, you wait a minute.

Mother Teresa was given, to our certain knowledge, many tens of millions of pounds. But she never built any hospitals. She claimed to have built almost 150 convents, for nuns joining her own order, in several countries. Was this where ordinary donors thought their money was going?

Furthermore, she received some of this money from the Duvaliers, and from Mr Charles Keating of the notorious Lincoln Savings and Loan of California, and both these sources had acquired the money by - how shall I put it? - borrowing money from the poor and failing to give it back.

How could this possibly be true? Doesn't everyone know that she spent her time kissing the sores of lepers and healing the sick? Ah, but what everyone knows isn't always true. You were more likely to run into Mother Teresa being photographed with Nancy Reagan, or posing with Princess Diana, or in the first-class cabin of Air India (where she had a permanent reservation).

You could see her in Ireland, campaigning against a law which would permit civil divorce and remarriage (though she publicly defended Princess Diana's right to be divorced).

You could encounter her on the podium in Stockholm, accepting yet another huge cheque and telling the Nobel audience that the greatest threat to world peace was... abortion. (Since she added that contraception was morally as bad as abortion, she essentially held the view that condoms and coils were a deadly threat to world peace. The Church does not insist on that degree of fundamentalism.)

And when she got sick, she would check herself into the Mayo Clinic or some other temple of American medicine. As one who has visited her primitive "hospice" for the dying in Calcutta, I should call that a wise decision. Nobody would go there except to check out, in one way or another.

"Give a man a reputation as an early riser," said Mark Twain "and that man can sleep till noon." Give a woman a reputation for holiness and compassion and apparently nothing she does can cause her to lose it.

Of Albanian descent and a keen nationalist, she visited the country when it was still a brutal dictatorship and "the world's first atheist state" to pay tribute to its grim Stalinist leader.

She fawned upon her shrewd protector Indira Gandhi at a time when the Indian government was imposing forced sterilisations. Above all, she urged the poor to think of their sufferings as a gift from God.

And she opposed the only thing that has ever been known to cure poverty - the empowerment of women in poor countries by giving them some say in their own reproduction.

Now, so they tell us, a woman in Bengal has recovered from a tumour after praying to Mother Teresa. I have received information from both the family and the physicians that says it was good medical treatment that did the job. Who knows?

I must say that I don't believe in miracles but if they do exist there are deserving cases which don't, in spite of fervent prayers, ever benefit from them.

When Mr Donahue was asked if he believed the statutory second miracle would occur, he said that he thought it would. I said that I thought so, too.

But I have already seen a collective hallucination occur as regards Mother Teresa, though it was produced by the less supernatural methods of modern, uncritical mass media.

Christopher Hitchens is a columnist for Vanity Fair.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last

1 posted on 01/13/2003 9:34:12 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD
Thanks Registered

2 posted on 01/13/2003 9:36:20 PM PST by Mo1 (Join the DC Chapter at the Patriots Rally III on 1/18/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
She is a pop hero..so the truth is irrevelent.
3 posted on 01/13/2003 9:38:38 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: [it is] the gift of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Mr. Hitchens should hire a fact-checker. Most obviously, he doesn't even know the name of the man he was debating with on television
4 posted on 01/13/2003 9:40:12 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Uh-oh... let the discussion begin! Mr. Hitchens does bring up some points that look good at the first reading, but I think I should check them out too. He does show his true colors when he describes Mother Teresa's opposition to abortion as "fundamentalist" in character. I think we need to take this whole piece with a grain of salt before it is touted around as completely true.
5 posted on 01/13/2003 9:41:38 PM PST by Pyro7480 (+ Vive Jesus! (Live Jesus!) +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Where in the Bible does it enumerate all the hoops one must jump through to become a Saint?
6 posted on 01/13/2003 9:41:51 PM PST by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
And she opposed the only thing that has ever been known to cure poverty

Abortion and sterilization are the only thing ever known to cure poverty? There is any proof that these have ever cured poverty? Does anyone want to argue that these are the reason the U.S. is prosperous?

7 posted on 01/13/2003 9:43:45 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
had railed against birth-control in the most overpopulated city on the planet and had been the spokeswoman for the most extreme dogmas of religious fundamentalism.

Just Hitchen's needlessly wordy way of saying "She knew abortion was murder and said so, hence I hate her for it".

You must be slipping Christopher. One look at the title and I knew exactly where you were going with this.

8 posted on 01/13/2003 9:47:38 PM PST by WarSlut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan; NYer; Polycarp; JMJ333; Desdemona; Salvation; Aquinasfan; Bigg Red
Ping!
9 posted on 01/13/2003 9:47:54 PM PST by Pyro7480 (+ Vive Jesus! (Live Jesus!) +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Do you think that everything that Jesus said in the Gospels is irrevelent? The Beattitudes were apparently just meaningless space-fillers? When asked what the greatest commandement was, Jesus gave the wrong answer?
10 posted on 01/13/2003 9:48:27 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I am not a Roman Catholic and the saint-making procedures of the Vatican are really none of my business.

'Nuff said, Chris.

11 posted on 01/13/2003 9:50:28 PM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
You bring up a good question, but as you probably know, the Catholic Church doesn't just rely on the Bible. It also relies on Church tradition. The canonization process is instititutonal in character. The Church on Earth, through the canonization process, recognizes that through a holy person's actions during life, and through their intercession after death, which manifests itself through miracles, that because of these, a person is a saint. Other souls in heaven are most likely also saints in the literal sense, but they haven't been officially recognized as such by the Catholic Church.
12 posted on 01/13/2003 9:51:50 PM PST by Pyro7480 (+ Vive Jesus! (Live Jesus!) +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
She is a pop hero..so the truth is irrevelent.

Yes, living the beatitudes is just so, well, irrelevant! Unlike our own lives, of course!

13 posted on 01/13/2003 9:52:57 PM PST by american colleen (wish I had MT's guts and love for the man in the gutter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
railed against birth-control in the most overpopulated city on the planet

Apparently, Mr. Hitchens knows which people are worthy of living and which ones aren't. According to Hitchens standards, Adolf Hitler would be a better candidate for saint, sinc he was all for things like abortion and sterilaization, and he wasn't shy about deciding who was worthy of living and following through on that decision. Sorry Mr. Hitchens, most people have more sense than you when it comes to this.

14 posted on 01/13/2003 9:54:23 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
And she opposed the only thing that has ever been known to cure poverty - the empowerment of women in poor countries by giving them some say in their own reproduction.

Utter hogwash. You know the reliably brilliant but nonetheless passionately atheistic Hitchens is thrashing around looking for some handy club to hit Mother Theresa over the head with when he makes a remark as ludicrous as this one.

15 posted on 01/13/2003 9:57:36 PM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Mr. Hitchens neglects to mention that Mother Teresa didn't solicit money, either herself or through anyone else. People did give her money, but she never actively pursued it. In one movie about her there is a man telling her about how he's going to raise money for her and she refuses him.
16 posted on 01/13/2003 9:58:34 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Abortion and sterilization are the only thing ever known to cure poverty? There is any proof that these have ever cured poverty? Does anyone want to argue that these are the reason the U.S. is prosperous?

I don't think it's worth it to discuss this article. It's a hit piece, period.

Your point is well made but not necessary.

17 posted on 01/13/2003 9:58:52 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
The bible doesn't say that. Just more Papist Bunk..

Eph 1:15 Salute Philologus, and Julia, Nereus, and his sister, and Olympas, and all the saints which are with them.

2Co 1:1

Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, and Timothy our brother, unto the church of God which is at Corinth, with all the saints which are in all Achaia:,

2Co 13:13

All the saints salute you. Eph 1:15

Wherefore I also, after I heard of your faith in the Lord Jesus, and love unto all the saints,

Php 1:1

Paul and Timotheus, the servants of Jesus Christ, to all the saints in Christ Jesus which are at Philippi, with the bishops and deacons:

Php 4:22

All the saints salute you, chiefly they that are of Caesar's household.

Col 1:4

Since we heard of your faith in Christ Jesus, and of the love which ye have to all the saints,

Heb 13:24

Salute all them that have the rule over you, and all the saints. They of Italy salute you.

18 posted on 01/13/2003 9:59:09 PM PST by netman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
deceived
19 posted on 01/13/2003 10:00:28 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: [it is] the gift of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
You bring up a good question, but as you probably know, the Catholic Church doesn't just rely on the Bible. It also relies on Church tradition.

Well, the Catholic Church can kiss my traditional butt. I see numerous references to saints in the Bible and as far as I know the Catholic Church wasn't around in the days these references are made.

1 Samuel 2:9

Psalms 16:3

Psalms 30:4

Psalms 31:23Psalms 34:9

Daniel 7:8

Romans 8:27

1 Corinthians 6:2

Ephesians 1:15

Revelations 5:8

Revelations 19:8

And not one word about the bureaucratic red tape it takes to become a Saint.

20 posted on 01/13/2003 10:02:10 PM PST by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson