First, thanks to dittojed2 for posting the interesting article.
As to your specific comment above, I would appreciate your fleshing out how you see open theism as negating or diminishing a commitment to inerrancy.
I have thought that one of the OT proponents' strongest cases is the OT ability to accept the 'plain meaning' of many important Old Testament passages on God relenting and changing His mind, i.e. interacting with mankind. So, at least in the respect of accepting the plain meaning of Scripture, OT seems to make a pretty strong case for inerrancy.