Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: faithhopecharity
He explained the teaching as simply NO, except where genuinely necessary to save the mother’s life.

A better way to articulate it is: if there is a dire medical situation where the woman's life is in danger and the only way to save her life involves the possibility (or even the probability) of losing the child, then the procedure is permitted. At this point, it ceases to be an abortion (the direct and intentional killing of an unborn human being) but an effort to save the mother's life with the unfortunate risk of losing the child.

8 posted on 12/09/2022 5:22:18 PM PST by fidelis (👈 Under no obligation to respond to rude, ignorant, abusive, bellicose, and obnoxious posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: fidelis

Yes. If a choice is necessary, there are people already dependent on the mother


9 posted on 12/09/2022 6:11:34 PM PST by faithhopecharity (“Politicians are not born. They're excreted.” Marcus Tillius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson