Sodomy is not, IMO, a compelling state interest.
I don’t know why they don’t just design something ugly and when the people complain just say you can’t turn on creativity.
Can Colorado’s law be applied to Twitter/Google/FaceBook discrimination against conservative posters?
The legal existence of Western states is as far as I know is conditioned on “perfect religious freedom” as part of Congressional state creation acts.
I suggest asking the Supreme Court to void the legal existence of all states in violation of their ‘perfect religious freedom’ requirement from the date of violation.
Their senators - gone!
Their representatives in the House - gone!
Their electors for Biden - zilch!
“Colorado may prohibit speech that promotes unlawful activity, including unlawful discrimination....”
The State of Colorado is a federal creation and should be fully bound by Amendment I.
The Supreme Court in recent years has been very free speech and press supportive.
Voiding the existence of a state because it violated a requirement for its very existence avoids the need to declare any particular law issued by the state as unconstitutional.
Colorado would revert to territorial status I believe.
Sir, Aaron Junior will not cast a golden calf for you.
“limited access to goods or services”
Welcome to the lifestyles of low-income Americans.
The Communist Tyranny Is Growing Exponentially & Nothing Is Being Done About It!
I thought the Supreme Court settled this a few years ago.
Since when are members of the Alphabet tyranny marginalized? Especially in urban Colorado.
Compelling State interest is not going to play well on appeal.
10th Circuit = Infiltrated
11th Circuit = Infiltrated.
Just to name a few.