Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: edwinland
Just as I honestly and serenely obeyed questionable orders sixty years ago, believing that they represented the loving voice of the Church, so today with equal serenity and honesty I recognize that I have been deceived. Being coherent today by persevering in error would represent a wretched choice and would make me an accomplice in this fraud. Claiming a clarity of judgment from the beginning would not be honest: we all knew that the Council would be more or less a revolution, but we could not have imagined that it would prove to be so devastating, even for the work of those who should have prevented it.

Does the statement above not convince you that your #1 proposition is the correct answer?

And by the way, Cardinal Ottavani and Archbishop LeFebvre did know better and did speak out and they were ignored.

12 posted on 06/10/2020 9:04:31 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: ebb tide

Maybe I’m easily confused but that looks to me more like 2 — a rejection of the council itself.


14 posted on 06/10/2020 9:29:08 PM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson