Who or What Is the Antichrist? A Reflection on the Biblical Teaching

Archdiocese of Washington ^ | 10-24-19 | Msgr. Charles Pope

[Salvation]

** It is as if Scripture wants to tell us to be ready and to let us know that we don’t need to (and shouldn’t want to) know all the details. Just be ready, and when those times set in remember that Christ has already won the battle. Viva Christo Rey!**

[Salvation]

Monsignor Pope Ping!

[GulfMan]

Stick around, we might very well find out very soon ...

[Lurkinanloomin]

I’m beginning to think it might be the ImPopester.

[2Dreamin]

No, but he has got a lot of False Prophet in him.

[fproy2222]

So I need to refer to some peopls as
AN antiChrist and not
THE antiChrist.

[struggle]

The man that “unifies” Islam and Christianity.

[Wildbill22]

Obama.

[HollyB]

“ John speaks of antichrists in the plural whereas St. Paul speaks in the singular: the man of lawlessness or the lawless one.”

[MHGinTN]

You as a Mormon are immersed in the spirit of antichrist. The forest and trees analogy comes to mind for you ...

[fproy2222]

Thank you for the ©YOU™ statement.

[fproy2222]

Thank you. Somehow I picked up on the idea of only one antiChrist. The big “THE”.

[ealgeone]

For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and produce great signs and wonders, to lead astray, if possible, even the elect (Matthew 24:24).

Rome's stance on the apparitions purporting to be Mary for instance.

[Iscool]

So I need to refer to some peopls as AN antiChrist and not THE antiChrist.

Don't bet your life on the Catholic Religion's interpretation of scripture...

[fproy2222]

Ya, I noticed.
Protestants do not agree with Catholic.
Protestants do not even adree with other Protestants.
A Protestants’ Protestant.
A reformer’s reformer.

[MHGinTN]

And neither Protestants nor Catholics accept your Mormon religion as from God. Well, maybe you believe the Mormon god joe smith since he’s been dead long enough to have achieved Moronic Mormonic godhood.

[Campion]

Private revelations are never required for belief. They can be approved, or reprobated, but never required.

[ealgeone]

Private revelations are never required for belief. They can be approved, or reprobated, but never required.

It is irrelevant they are not required for belief. What is relevant is Rome has allowed them to be believed.

Among the most egregious is the false promise of the Brown Scapular.

[Campion]

It is irrelevant they are not required for belief.

You get to declare what is or isn't relevant? What is relevant is Rome has allowed them to be believed.

Are the novelties and inventions of Protestantism relevant? I ask because the list is a long one, everything from the "secret rapture" to "prayer cloths".