[daniel1212]

Even the author of this article recognizes this is not a dogmatic declaration of the canon...and it did not eliminate the question of the canon for Rome as daniel1212 has noted.

And yet look at the hand-wringing debate when faced with a teaching that Florence did dogmatically declare (since the V2 "clarification" is rather clearly a contradiction of it): https://forums.catholic.com/t/how-is-this-papal-bull-not-infallible/78970/30

Just one more example of how the self-proclaimed grandInterpreter is subject to interpretation.

[ealgeone]

Here's another one that is still in effect....yet Roman Catholicism runs from it like ice from heat.

Canons 68: Jews and Muslims shall wear a special dress to enable them to be distinguished from Christians so that no Christian shall come to marry them ignorant of who they are.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Council_of_the_Lateran

Further illustrating that Roman Catholics pick and choose which of their "dogmatic" decrees they want to follow.

As you know there are many others that have fallen by the wayside as in being ignored by the Roman Catholic.