To: daniel1212; fidelis; Petrosius
Actually, when Rome finally "infallibly" defined its canon, it came after a vote of 24 yea, 15 nay, with 16 abstaining (44%, 27%, 29%) as to whether to affirm it as an article of faith with its anathemas on those who dissent from it. In other words, there was not even "unanimous consent" even among Roman Catholics at Trent on their canon!
34 posted on
10/07/2019 4:53:22 AM PDT by
ealgeone
To: ealgeone
In other words, there was not even "unanimous consent" even among Roman Catholics at Trent on their canon! Not in the history some Caths claim there was, and not in Trent at least as concerns dogmatically defining it. And "unanimous" does not mean unanimous as used by Rome, such as “
stipulated “
unanimous consent” of the fathers
35 posted on
10/07/2019 5:17:23 AM PDT by
daniel1212
( Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
To: ealgeone
In other words, there was not even "unanimous consent" even among Roman Catholics at Trent on their canon! I shudda read ahead!
87 posted on
10/08/2019 5:03:25 AM PDT by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson