More ignorance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Temple#Herod%27s_Temple
This is the type of thing I mean as trying to gain a foothold when you lost the war. I did not argue the KJV is a mistranslation, but made a distinction btwn the temple itself, as meaning the holy place of prayer and Solomon's porch in the "the Temple's Outer Court" (of the Gentiles) though that is also included in the phrase "in the Temple." (Mark 11:15)
When the Jews cried out, "Men of Israel, help: This is the man, that teacheth all men every where against the people, and the law, and this place: and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place" (Acts 21:28; cf. Luke 1:9) they were not protesting a Gentile being in the Court of the Gentiles, but bring him "into the temple."
To the east of the court was Solomon's Porch, and to the north, the soreg, the "middle wall of separation",[cf. Ephesians 2:14] a stone wall separating the public area from the inner sanctuary where only Jews could enter, described as being 3 cubits high by Josephus (Wars 5.5.2 [3b] 6.2.4).
The point which you missed in your quest for a jot was that Christ is not at all described as going into the inner sanctuary to taker part in worship, but to teach in Solomon's Porch which this opportunity provided Him.
Postulating what the Messiah did because one did something two thousand years later is an example/fallacy of cultural bias. There is no evidence in the scripture that the Feast of the Dedication at the Holy Temple was a cultural celebration. There is no other place in scripture that explains the Feast of the Dedication except Second Maccabees and the Gospel of John, which every Christian must accept as inspired by the Holy Spirit, explicitly mentioned the Feast of the Dedication (Re-dedication) of the Holy Temple in the context of the presence of the Messiah. One might consider this very significant and not filler.
This is supposed to be an argument?! Cultural bias? Because the Dedication at the Holy Temple was not a cultural celebration? Yes, it certainly was a cultural celebration just as the Catholic feasts of St. Anthony etc. I have gone to are, for (surprise) religion usually goes together with culture. And ministering the Word at such or even affirmatively recognizing it simply does not translate into making the record of its institution Scripture. Thus the weight of evidence as shown is that before the church began leadership did not class it as Scripture.
You were given too many chances, and now you really will be ignored, but will give your new-found comrade another chance.