Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

Homo expert on the bible, what does he think he is, a priest?


2 posted on 09/06/2019 6:12:16 PM PDT by King Moonracer (Tag, you're it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: King Moonracer

Ouch, that leaves a mark.


4 posted on 09/06/2019 6:12:58 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: King Moonracer

This man is the Antichrist, or thinks he is.


5 posted on 09/06/2019 6:14:53 PM PDT by Richard Axtell (I am at a loss, how much lower will they go before all hell breaks loose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: King Moonracer

I am willing to wager the perv cannot use the Bible to justify his penchant for buggery


64 posted on 09/07/2019 11:26:07 AM PDT by okie 54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: King Moonracer
Homo expert on the bible, what does he think he is, a priest?

That would be no solution, including (for RCs) the use of the NABRE (official RC Bible for America) which will not use render “porneia” as “sexual immorality” or anything sexual in places such as simply rendering the words for fornication/fornicator as "immorality" or "immoral persons" among the many occurrences of the words for sexual immorality. (Matthew 5:32 Matthew 15:19 Matthew 19:9 Mark 7:21 John 8:41 Acts 15:20 Acts 15:29 Acts 21:25 Romans 1:29 1 Corinthians 5:1 1 Corinthians 5:9 1 Corinthians 5:10 1 Corinthians 5:11 1 Corinthians 6:9 1 Corinthians 6:13 1 Corinthians 6:18 1 Corinthians 5:9 ,10,11; 7:2; 6:9; 1 Corinthians 10:8 2 Corinthians 12:21 Galatians 5:19 Ephesians 5:3 Colossians 3:5 1 Thessalonians 4:3 Hebrews 12:16 Jude 7 Revelation 2:14,20,21; 9:21; 14:8;17:2,4; 18:3,9; 19:2) even though in most cases it is in a sexual context.

In addition to which is the significant homosexual problem in the RC priesthood, which may be related to the above .

But while pro-homosexual authors have spend an inordinate amount of effort seeking to disallow the Biblical condemnation of homosexual relations and even find sanction for the same, yet by the grace of God such sophistry has been exposed and refuted.

For what Ssripture shows is that God made man and women distinctively different yet uniquely compatible and complementary, and only joined them together in marriage - as the Lord Jesus Himself specified - and only condemned homosexual relations wherever they are manifestly dealt with.

Yet there is still room at the cross for all who will come to God in repentance and faith, and trust in the Divine Son of God sent by the Father, the risen Lord Jesus, to save them on His account, by His sinless shed blood, and thus be baptized and live for Him. Acts 10:36-47

68 posted on 09/08/2019 2:51:17 AM PDT by daniel1212 ( Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: King Moonracer

I once heard someone in a public forum ask Ken Kesey (of “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest”) (of all people) when did he think “life” begins, and he answered “When did the Lord become incarnate?” Blew me away.

And then he went on, “But from a secular point of view, these ‘choice’ people, they claim they don’t know when life begins, but they sure know how to end it. If that being in your womb wasn’t alive, you wouldn’t be looking it kill it.”

Everybody, even a little child, would know that. As Benjamin Franklin said, “We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.”


73 posted on 09/12/2019 7:24:16 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("My Beloved is mine, and I am His." (Song of Solomon 2:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson