Book cover for "Rock of Ages: Subcultural Religious Identity and Public Opinion among Young Evangelicals" (2019) by Jeremiah Castle. | Temple University Press
Posted on 08/31/2019 11:15:24 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Are today's young evangelicals becoming more liberal?
This is the main question behind Central Michigan University political scientist Jeremiah Castle's new book, Rock of Ages: Subcultural Religious Identity and Public Opinion among Young Evangelicals, published this month by Temple University Press.
For the most part, Castle found young evangelicals to be just as conservative as older evangelicals, with a few notable exceptions.
Looking at ideological identification, political party identification, issue positions and issue priorities, young evangelicals look like their older peers.
Book cover for "Rock of Ages: Subcultural Religious Identity and Public Opinion among Young Evangelicals" (2019) by Jeremiah Castle. | Temple University Press
Castle found young evangelicals, 18-29, to be more liberal than previous generations of young evangelicals on three issues — gay marriage, immigration and welfare. (His data included all races except black. Black evangelicals were coded as black Protestant.)
About half, 51%, of young evangelicals oppose gay marriage, compared to 73% of evangelicals 75 and older. Young evangelicals are still significantly more likely, by 31 percentage points, to oppose gay marriage than their peers, however.
On immigration, only about 1/3 of young evangelicals (32%) believe immigrants have made the country worse, compared to about 2/3 (68%) of old evangelicals (65 and older). Like gay marriage, young evangelicals are still more conservative than their age-group peers on immigration, but the gap is smaller — 13 percentage points.
On government aid to the poor, young evangelicals are also more liberal but the difference is not as large as gay marriage and immigration. When asked whether welfare helps the poor or does more harm than good, 54% of young evangelicals answered more harm than good, compared to 62% for both the 30-49 and 50-64 age groups. Young evangelicals are 14 percentage points more conservative than their age-group peers on this issue.
On foreign policy, on a survey question asking respondents whether diplomacy or more military strength is better for peace, 39% of young evangelicals took the pro-military position, compared to 46% of evangelicals aged 30-49 and 53% of evangelicals aged 50-64.
There were other issues where young evangelicals were more liberal, but when Castle controlled for age-based effects (changing issue positions as one ages or sharing ideological traits with generational peers), only those three issues — gay marriage, immigration and welfare — showed a more liberal direction for young evangelicals. Plus, on the welfare issue, the difference was so small Castle was unsure whether he was seeing a shift among young evangelicals.
"In short, the results cast serious doubt on general accounts of a new generation of young, liberal evangelicals," Castle concluded.
Additionally, while some have noticed a change in priorities for some young evangelicals, such as a greater emphasis on caring for the poor as part of their pro-life activism, Castle did not find that pattern in survey data, noting that "young evangelicals continue to rank immigration, the wealth gap, and the environment fairly low in terms of their issue concerns."
Castle did find a difference, however, between young and old evangelicals in voting for President Donald Trump.
In the 2012 presidential election, young evangelicals voted for the Republican candidate, Mitt Romney, at close to the same rate as old evangelicals (71% for 18-29, 74% for 50-64, 79% for 65+). But in the 2016 presidential election, there was a large gap — 21 percentage points — between young and old evangelicals. A majority of young evangelicals still supported Trump, 61%, but the rate was much smaller than for older evangelicals. The oldest evangelicals showed the strongest support — 82% of evangelicals 65 and older voted for Trump.
The gap was not caused by young evangelicals backing the Democrat, Hillary Clinton, however. Instead, 14% of young evangelicals opted for a third party, independent or write-in candidate, and those candidates were, in general, conservatives.
"Patterns in voting behavior outside the major party candidates suggest that many young evangelicals were seeking a more socially and politically orthodox conservative candidate," Castle wrote.
One chapter from Castle's book takes a closer look at liberal young evangelicals, who are 15% of young evangelicals and follow liberal evangelical leaders like Tony Campolo, Shane Claiborne, Ron Sider and Jim Wallis. Castle found that, as expected, liberal young evangelicals prioritize issues like poverty and the environment. He was surprised to find, however, that liberal young evangelicals are still somewhat conservative on social issues, like abortion and traditional marriage, especially compared to liberal young non-evangelicals, even though they don't make those issues a priority.
In an Aug. 20 article for FiveThirtyEight, Daniel Cox, a research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, also looked at the views of young evangelicals using some more recent data. Unlike Castle, Cox examined only white young evangelicals.
Similar to Castle's findings, Cox found Trump was less favorable among young white evangelicals than older white evangelicals. Only 60% of white evangelicals aged 18 to 44 said they were favorable to Trump, compared to 80% for those 45 and older. And among the favorable, the differences were even more stark when comparing the "very favorable" to "somewhat favorable." Only 25% of the younger white evangelicals answered "very favorable" compared to 55% for the older age groups.
Also like Castle, Cox found a generational divide on immigration, where most young white evangelicals (66%) think immigrants are good for the country and most old white evangelicals (54%) say immigrants are a burden.
This is especially important, Cox pointed out, because data provided to him by Pew Research Center showed an increase in white evangelicals saying immigration should be a top priority, from 49% in 2014 to 72% in 2019. Cox shared this data with The Christian Post. It shows the biggest increases — 10 percentage points — in white evangelicals saying immigration should be a top priority from January 2015 (55%) to January 2016 (65%) and from January 2018 (62%) to January 2019 (72%). In the general population, for comparison, those saying immigration should be a top priority didn't change much from 2018 to 2019, from 47% to 51%.
I’m older than college age, but still millennial — and finding more people in line with my values in Catholic circles more than Evangelical. And indeed Progressivism (the social dimension of it especially) is even stronger among ‘whites’ than others.
Mark 7
They worship me in vain; their teachings are merely human rules.’
You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to human traditions.”
And he continued, “You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe your own traditions!
The so-called "Left" categorizes, labels, identifies and classifies men and women of all ages in order to demean, criticize and ostracize them. In the America of the 1600's and 1700's free persons of all ages participated in the "spirit of liberty" observed by Burke, and later by Tocqueville. Those great Americans did not place people in "buckets" as did Clinton, nor seek to shut down their voices, as do the current Progressive movement leaders.
Enough of the foolish and divisive elitist identification of individuals, in order to form them into some collective group for purposes of limiting their discourse or their participation in the cause of liberty!
I went through a men’s retreat at my church that was led by Tony Campolo. I was not impressed with the guy. He has a political agenda, and masks it with Churchian Christianity. He was a phony.
I never heard of Tony Campolo, so I looked him up.. He’s known for being a Huge Lefty. Bill Clinton’s spiritual advisor and all that. LOL.
Never heard of any of these people. Also 538 is often wrong on research, famously predicting Trump would lose the presidential nomination with only a 20% chance of winning. HuffPoo has an interesting article on "what's wrong with 538.
Yeah, this was 10-15 years ago in the retreat, but even back then it wasn’t good, I assume he’s probably moved further to the left since then. He was basically all about the need for “social justice.” Any time you hear that, run. It’s just the progressive replacement for the Gospel, it’s not Christian. Can’t believe I sat through 2 days of that.
Jim Wallis in particular is a total fake, he’s a Democrat political operative masquerading as a Christian. He’s also a Soros stooge. A real snake.
Irony is he and Campolo claim all you have to do to be a Christian is to read Jesus’ words and you can ignore everything else. The “Red-Letter Bible,” but even there they ignore Jesus words that condemn sexual immorality, say marriage is between a man and a woman, and say that the sexually immoral are going to Hell. (E.g., they don’t acknowledge Jesus’ words in the Book of Revelation—also marked in red in my Bible.)
What is an “Evangelical”? That is a sincere question.
I have served in the church in two denominations. I still do not know.
I was once told by an “Evangelical” - a man who was a devout Democrat and who became a de facto Marxist after graduating from an “Evangelical” seminary - that I could not be one, though my denomination spent more on missions, and had more missionaries, than most.
The Evangelium - the Gospel, the Good News - is the concern of all genuine Christians.
The term is abused, and apparently now is a vague and ambiguous catch-all for persons adhering to Arminian and Anabaptist theology, and who often belong to non-denominational churches - a default denomination unto itself.
Although often typed as the most conservative of all Christian groups in America, many (like the man above) are very “liberal” socio-politically. They are thoughtlessly traditional, rather than thoughtfully conservative.
I also heard him once. It did not take me long to classify him as just another popular heretic - a glib hireling.
Tony Campolo, ostensible spiritual advisor, is infamous for joking around with the unrepentant lecherous adulterer, Bill Clinton, at Ron Brown’s funeral; the two suddenly turned sober when they realized they were being filmed. Phonies: the pair of them.
The truth is that the Frankfurt School successfully infiltrated and subverted seminaries many decades ago. Too many of the so-called Evangelical seminaries are little more than heresy factories. (Fuller Theological is one of the worst.)
So-called Evangelicals are neither as orthodox nor as conservative as the Enemedia portrays them. (Do not look to secular leftists to even understand what those things are.)
Sojourners is Cultural Marxism.
Jim Wallis is an evil heretic.
Younger people are more liberal in general all the time. I was. My conservativism has been solidified thru greater education, experience, and a genuine desire for truth. I didn’t have time and didn’t care about that when I was younger.
Yep.. Leftists see funerals as a fun time.. full of all kinds of opportunities to bloviate and criticize their political opponents.
So white evangelicals are no longer white Protestants? This is an interesting change over the last 500 years. Have they become evangelical Catholic or evangelical Orthodox now?
Spot on.
“Enemedia” Love it!
It sounds like White Evangelicals are broken out separately from White Protestants, while Black Evangelicals are not.
If by White Protestants they mean Episcopalian/Presbyterian USA/ELCA, I can understand why they’re separate from White Evangelicals.
Hmmm. If I was a black protestant I might the find the "well all those black churches are alike anyway so we'll dump 'em all into one category" argument a teeny bit offensive.
Thanks for finding and posting such articles.
The way I see it, “evangelical” used to be a term for positive, Bible-based, traditional Christian teachings and values. I guess I was one, years ago. Many/most of those who call themselves evangelical seem to have gone off the deep end into contemporary religion. I think I’m more of a fundamentalist (fundamental Bible-based beliefs) now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.