How do they know?
I'm offended on behalf of the daughter.
Who do I write to?
Posted on 07/23/2019 12:29:23 AM PDT by Morgana
WACO, Texas — A Waco couple said their daughter was denied admission to a local day care because they are in a lesbian relationship.
Brittney Ready and her wife, Stacey, have been married for two years and have four kids.
Their youngest daughter, Callie, was on the waiting list at Parkview Christian Academy until they got a call Thursday saying the day care finally had an opening.
Brittney wrote on Facebook that the director was sweet and welcoming to the couple and their daughter. It wasn't until they were ready to leave that they ran into problems.
“We go to leave with paperwork in hand only for the administrator to call us into his office to let us know that he heard that Stacey and I our 'mates' and because of that they cannot welcome Callie" Brittney said.
Ready said the director told the couple the day care could not welcome Callie because their christian-based faith would not be able to accept their daughter.
“So does that mean 'unwed parents' cannot enroll their kids? Does that mean 'divorced parents' cannot enroll their children there?" Brittney said. "Sin is sin and Jesus sat and welcomed all the sinners. We were not trying to plague your day care, sir. We are gay. Our daughter is not."
Stacey said it's important to the women that their children receive a christian education.
(Excerpt) Read more at kcentv.com ...
Why honey, that's what you got and for free no less! Christians are not "down" with the homosexual lifestyle.
[Brittney Ready and her wife, Stacey]
Well, I guess we now know which one plays “the man”....
>>have been married for two years and have four kids.
By what science?
>> “Sin is sin and Jesus sat and welcomed all the sinners. We were not trying to plague your day care, sir. We are gay. Our daughter is not.”
So are they acknowledging that they are living in sin?
Go forth and sin no more.
4 kids huh? It appears someone is engaging in a little heterosexual sex. 😁😆🤣 I wonder which one was being “unfaithful?” 😀😁😆
Sorry folks...
Sin or not, in this case i’m on the side of the gay couple. There’s no way that they should be denied day care by a christian organization or business. This is absolutely a black eye for the church.
that being said, there should not be a law against that kind of bigotry that forces them to care for that child against their ‘standards’.
It’s a trojan horse. They will get their kids in then “complain” that the churches teaching against homosexuality is “hate speech”.
No...they can go else where.
Sin is sin...and Jesus welcomed all...
These folks take a snippet of the Christs words and actions and misapply and extrapolate it to justify their own sinning lives...even if you dont believe in Jesus...that is a very naive interpretation of the work of Jesus the Christ.
How do they know?
I'm offended on behalf of the daughter.
Who do I write to?
“They will get their kids in then “complain” that the churches teaching against homosexuality is “hate speech”.”
That may be true. But it’s easier to make the case that the gay couple should have known better than to place their children into a christian day care than to try and defend why the church turned these children away because of their bigotry towards the parents lifestyle.
I get it that there’s multiple ways to look at this. I just land on the side of the gay couple because this will be very difficult to argue in a consistent manner. It’s one thing to refuse to bake a gay wedding cake, i can get on that side. But to turn away their children from day care is a different topic to discuss.
1 Corinthians 7:14 For the unbelieving husband is made holy because of his wife, and the unbelieving wife is made holy because of her husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy
“forced to recognize an illigitimate person who is NOT a child’s mother or father as a parental authority. Neither person in that relationship is a believer.”
I wasn’t talking about being forced to recognize an illegitimate person. Although i’m not 100% certain what you mean by “illegitimate person”. What they should have done is to have embraced these children the way Jesus did regardless of their politics or sexuality. You know... let your light shine before men right? Then there’d have been a chance to win the hearts of these people. But that ship has sailed now hasn’t it? It only comes down now to whether or not i would condone their decision.
Which I Do Not... Although I appear to be alone here.
You’re straining a gnat to swallow a camel here guys.
Don’t be a pharisee...
[By what science?]
Well, ya know .... “The science is settled!”
Just like Global Warming.
Where you change XY chromosomes into XX and XX change into XY via surgery! /liberal stupidity
How does a woman have 4 kids in 2 years?
Heh.
Well they brought them from previous relationships - where XY meets XX, obviously. I was guessing that meant the two of them have been “a couple” for 2 years.
Or adoption. Or fertility clinics where twins and triplets are becoming the norm.
Or they are the kids from a previous husband/boyfriend(s).
yep
Exactly!! Trojan horse, camel’s nose, etc. - it’s all a setup against legitimate Christian doctrine.
"But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven."
Matthew 19:14 AKJV
+1
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.