Posted on 07/19/2019 3:41:28 PM PDT by ebb tide
A Church historian at Philadelphia’s Villanova University has said three U.S. bishops are “devout schismatics” who try to diminish the authority of Pope Francis.
“They are devout in the sense that they publicly display their preference for a traditionalist Church and its devotions, such as the rosary. They are schismatics because they openly promote the undermining of the bishop of Rome among the Catholic faithful,” Massimo Faggioli wrote in a July 16 essay for La Croix magazine.
Faggioli made specific mention of three U.S. bishops among those he called “devout schismatics”: Archbishop Charles Chaput of Philadelphia, Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone of San Francisco, and Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas.
The historian said the “schismatic instincts” of those bishops were manifested in August 2018, when they “sided with Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, the former papal nuncio to Washington who called on Francis to resign.”
Viganò released on Aug. 25, 2018 a “testimony,” which, among other things, accused Pope Francis of ignoring warnings about former cardinal Theodore McCarrick’s sexual deviancy, and then raising McCarrick’s status within the Vatican.
After the testimony was released, Strickland issued a statement calling Viganò’s allegations “credible,” and Cordileone said he could confirm that some of Viganò’s statements were true.
Contrary to Faggioli’s claim, however, Chaput did not endorse Viganò’s allegations. A spokesman told reporters in August that Chaput “enjoyed working with Archbishop Viganò during his tenure as Apostolic Nuncio,” adding that Chaput found Viganò's time at the nunciature “to be marked by integrity to the Church.”
However, the spokesman said that Chaput could not comment “on Archbishop Viganò’s recent testimonial as it is beyond his personal experience.”
In July 19 comments to CNA, Faggioli said that he “did not state that the Archbishop called on Francis to resign or that he created a schism, only that he vouched for Viganò’s integrity. That seems like siding with Archbishop Viganò especially in the context of his continued silence about Viganò’s request for the resignation of the pope.”
Faggioli added that “Viganò put pressure on the pope to resign. One would expect a bishop - and especially an archbishop metropolitan who has twice received the pallium, a sign of special unity with Christ and of communion with the Successor of Peter - to defend the pope’s integrity and to say that no one has the right to ask the pope to resign.”
Shortly after Pope Francis was elected in 2013, Chaput told radio personality Hugh Hewitt that the election had made him “extraordinarily happy, because quite honestly, he is the man I was hoping would be Pope eight years ago.”
Two years later, Chaput hosted Pope Francis in Philadelphia for the 2015 World Meeting of Families. Reflecting in 2018 on that meeting, Chaput wrote that the pope’s “time with us was filled with powerful public moments and deeply grace filled intimate gatherings hallmarked by an overarching spirit of mercy, compassion, and charity.”
“[Pope Francis] has repeatedly challenged us to bear witness to Christ through concrete action—by serving the poor, by helping immigrants, by preserving families, and by protecting the sanctity of life. It’s the kind of challenge we can and should answer with a hearty yes each day,” Chaput added.
In his essay criticizing “devout schismatics,” Faggioli wrote that “dissent against this pope has become radicalized with schismatic instincts because this kind of political devotion is more about a partisan ideology than about the Church. Catholicism was exposed to ideological manipulation by those who do not really care for the Gospel, but who are more interested in a particular conservative political culture.”
Chaput, among those identified as a “devout schismatic,” has frequently emphasized his unwillingness to align with a political party, and criticized partisanship within the Church.
In 2016 he criticized Catholics, especially politicians, who accept “the transfer of our real loyalties and convictions from the old Church of our baptism to the new ‘Church’ of our ambitions and appetites,’ in order to achieve political or personal goals. he group of those who do so “cuts across...both major political parties,” Chaput said.
The Church's canon law defines schism, the charge Faggioli makes against the three bishops, as “the refusal of submission to the Supreme Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to him.”
Ed. note: This story was updated July 19 to include comments e-mailed to CNA by Faggioli.
Ping
Nice spin by an agnostic leftist. This “pope” deserves criticism. Only solace is that as long as Benedict lives, his “election” was a fraudulent usurpation.
Chaput for Pope.
I second the nomination...
Every one of us is subject to the Authentic Papal Magisterium, including the Pope himself. Which is to say, precisely because of the authority of he Papal Magisterium, Pope Francis has no right to contradict that which has been steadily taught by the past 266 popes, including Peter --- let alone to contradict Christ Himself . This he has done, in effect, by inserting pernicious novelties into the Catechism and the AAS.
Pope Francis himself enters into schism every time he breaks communion with all of his predecessors. That scalawag Rosica spoke truer than he knew, when he said that this papacy has shaken loose from Scripture and Tradition. It has shaken loose from its own proper authority in the exact same measure.
I had the amazing blessing to spend two hours with Bishop Chaput at a Kateri conference in Spokane. We were staying at the same hotel, and happened to stop in the bar area after the conference. I invited myself down and bought several bottles of wine as we sat and talked. He is a God filled man.
Massimo Faggioli, often called Max Beans on Catholic twitter, demands that all Catholics “think with Pope Francis,” and by that, he means that Catholics must refrain from criticizing the pontiff and agree with all Bergloglian pronouncements and opinions no matter how absurd.
My gut feeling tells me that Max was not such as papalist prior to 2013.
Wish someone expert would pipe up about the potential for him to be found an Anti-Pope.
A historian ought to learn the definition of the word “schismatic” before writing on it.
I have talked to Archbishop Cordileone for quite a while waiting for a plane to Rome a few years ago, and HOLINESS emanated from him!! LOVED HIM!!
Three good guys who have the guts to speak up at a time when we Catholics are having our faith attacked by the Argentinian Jesuit living in a Vatican hotel.
I'm just repeating what you said, because you said it so well.
Thank-you but NO AND HECK NO THANK-YOU!
"Catholicism was exposed to ideological manipulation by those who do not really care for the Gospel, but who are more interested in a particular conservative political culture.”"
It seems to me that the "ideological manipulation" is grounded in a particular SOCIALIST political culture.
We here in Denver were fortunate to have Bishop Chaput as our archbishop for a time...Your description as a “God-filled man” is so true, IMHO...
Robert Cardinal Sarah is another...Again, IMHO...I’m no theologian; just a flawed man struggling to remain faithful...The Church needs a leader...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.