Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: dartuser

I believe the 7 year agreement is the 7 year agreement and the tribulation is the tribulation. You obviously think they are the same. I don’t.

No, I don’t believe his coming was in 70AD. The people came in 70AD but the ruler did not. Only a roman general came in 70AD, not the ruler.

The city and temple were destroyed in 70AD and the ruler who WILL come came in 135AD and stopped the sacrifices.

And regarding your mocking of that - “At the former Temple sanctuary he (Hadrian) installed two statues, one of Jupiter, another of himself. In an attempt to erase any memory of Judea or Ancient Israel”

-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish%E2%80%93Roman_wars

That was the abomination of desolation. Set up in 135 AD. in the holy place - where the temple once stood.


49 posted on 05/14/2019 3:33:38 PM PDT by lerker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: lerker
Sorry ... I cant see any significance to 135 AD ...

The time period for the A of D of necessity is 3.5 years after the start of the covenant.

The math for the preterist position has never added up ...

54 posted on 05/14/2019 4:26:14 PM PDT by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson