Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian Orthodox Church Official Believes USSR Victory in World War II is People's Merit, not Stalin
Interfax ^ | 5/13/19

Posted on 05/13/2019 7:53:33 PM PDT by marshmallow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: stevem
and 1-2,000,000 victims of the other persuasion.

Give or take a few. Who cares?

21 posted on 05/13/2019 9:09:02 PM PDT by Concentrate (ex-texan was right and Always Right was wrong, which is why we lost the election. Podesta the molest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking
He didn’t really need it. The second front was to insure that Stalin would not go as far as Portugal.

Precisely. And thank God France fell as it did, because had we seen a long war of attrition, as in WWI, it would have been easy pickings for the Red Army.
22 posted on 05/13/2019 9:10:54 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking

The Poles are super pissed off that we tossed then to the Soviets.

Actually, I don’t blame them ONE bit..


23 posted on 05/13/2019 9:17:44 PM PDT by Concentrate (ex-texan was right and Always Right was wrong, which is why we lost the election. Podesta the molest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

IIRC, Stalin’s son was captured by the Germans, and Stalin threw his DIL in jail.


24 posted on 05/13/2019 9:36:28 PM PDT by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stevem

Yeah, you have to wonder if they’d have kept jumping into the meat grinder without Stalin threatening to shoot them if they didn’t.


25 posted on 05/13/2019 10:06:54 PM PDT by gundog ( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

“The Allies could have waltzed in there at a fraction of the cost, but the Russians insisted on taking the city themselves.”

The Russians didn’t insist on it, in fact the russian people had no say in the decision whatsoever. The only person whose decision mattered wasn’t even Russian at all — Stalin


26 posted on 05/13/2019 11:03:52 PM PDT by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator; NorseViking
Also, look at the areas that Stalin allowed Hitler basically to go into unimpeded at the start of Barbarossa, and note it was where the bulk of the Jews of the Soviet Union lived.

My understanding of the early days of Barbarossa was that Stalin retreated to his apartments in a deep depression on hearing of Germany’s invasion.

He basically left Russia leaderless because everyone was afraid to act without Stalin’s permission.

27 posted on 05/13/2019 11:09:03 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stevem

No Germans were aryans. And nice of you to call 6 million jes they murdered park of THEIR losses. And at the end of the war, Russians were standing in Berlin.

Pretty sick to put down nazi propaganda as fact.


28 posted on 05/13/2019 11:13:22 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stevem

For all the BS, after Barbarossa was fought to a stop, the Russians outfought, had better tactics, and launched a very hard army at the nazis....and kicked their asses.

The Russians lost hard? Hard to make your nazi case when they they were standing in Berlin at the end of the war.


29 posted on 05/13/2019 11:19:51 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
The only person whose decision mattered wasn’t even Russian at all — Stalin

And Hitler wasn't even German.

30 posted on 05/14/2019 12:14:10 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Eisenhower felt Berlin should go to the Russians as a kind of war prize. He felt the casualties would be too high and the Russians would have been angry for sure at not being able to get to the very heart of the “Fascist Beast’’. Also the American brass felt it was time to concentrate of finishing off Japan and ending the war. In hindsight, who knows?
31 posted on 05/14/2019 12:51:39 AM PDT by jmacusa ("The more numerous the laws the more corrupt the government''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

The only ‘’tactics’’ the Russians had was en masse. Infantry, armor and artillery.


32 posted on 05/14/2019 12:53:38 AM PDT by jmacusa ("The more numerous the laws the more corrupt the government''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

It seemed though the the Germans pretty much were surrendering in droves to the Western Allies, and many would have done anything to escape the wrath of the Russians.

Basically we could have told the Germans, “You can surrender to us, or to the Russians, your choice.”


33 posted on 05/14/2019 1:00:28 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

The shit some freepers say on FR, really.


34 posted on 05/14/2019 1:09:00 AM PDT by the_individual2014
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
One of my dad's cousins has an interview on the net about his little part in the war (done for a local kid's college project). I'm guessing that he was being fairly honest about it.

He got there just as the Battle of the Bulge was beginning. After the battle they came across a quiet village with no Nazi's (or so they thought). He was in recon, so out in front of the main force. He went into a tavern by himself to check it out. There were like 6 Nazi's in there eating. He put his rifle on them and they surrendered. I think they were pretty young.

He brings them outside to his small group (three jeeps iirc) and they all agree that they can't take them prisoner. So they got a white sheet, put it on a stick, and told them to keep marching back down the road and surrender to the larger army coming their way!

At the very end of his story he talks about a large group of actual S.S. soldiers finally surrendering. (I think it was more than just his squad though that got them). The S.S. would not just hand over their guns, but the Americans were allowed to take the guns and other stuff from the S.S. guys one at a time. He said it took two days to disarm them!

That was at the very end of the war. I had read another article about how the last shots of the war were sort of on accident when a plane fired it's guns on a bunch of captured German troops.

My relative didn't have that in his account, but I wonder....

35 posted on 05/14/2019 1:28:01 AM PDT by 21twelve (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
They knew that. There's a web site called ‘’critical past’’ on You Tube. Some really outstanding footage shot by US Army cameramen during April of 45 with GI’s rounding up droves of Germans, a lot of them older types, sullen German civilians and the occasional combat footage. You should check it out.
36 posted on 05/14/2019 11:10:45 AM PDT by jmacusa ("The more numerous the laws the more corrupt the government''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

That was very accurate early in the war through late 42. But after a year or so, that reality had changed. And by the time they were pushing the nazis back into Berlin, they were a very different army.
Nazi propaganda pushed a lot of odd things late in the war and you still hear them today. But they were basically intended to explain how poorly the Germans were performing in the last year of the war. The line was that they were always superior, but their heroic struggle was doomed by sheer numbers.
But the fact is they got their asses waxed by superior combined arms tactics and weaponry late in the war. The Il-2 hurt the krauts, and the T-34 did as well, but artillery was what destroyed the nazi army. And the red army learned to mass it very effectively and the krauts never successfully dealt with it. And it helped that we kept them -very- well supplied with ammo.


37 posted on 05/14/2019 6:22:01 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
But the Russians never lost their centralized command structure. Read Cornelius Ryan's “The Last Battle’’. It's about the Russian assault on Berlin. The German commander General Heinrici was well acquainted with Russian tactics and knew, as did other German commanders when to pull their troops back to reserve positions before the Soviet artillery fell. The Germans were far more fearful of American artillery and the ''Time On Target'' method of artillery fire and the fact that for every shell they sent over, we'd send ten.
38 posted on 05/14/2019 10:57:14 PM PDT by jmacusa ("The more numerous the laws the more corrupt the government''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson