To: ebb tide
For those who believe, no poof is needed, for those who do not believe, no proof is enough.
3 posted on
04/06/2019 5:40:02 PM PDT by
Rumplemeyer
(The GOP should stand its ground - and fix Bayonets)
To: Rumplemeyer
4 posted on
04/06/2019 5:45:46 PM PDT by
coaster123
(Men: Standard American handshake. Women: Curtsy.)
To: Rumplemeyer
An excellent and accurate point.
Luke 16:31 comes to mind.
6 posted on
04/06/2019 5:55:11 PM PDT by
MrEdd
(Caveat Emptor)
To: Rumplemeyer
What a ridiculous statement.
12 posted on
04/06/2019 6:13:40 PM PDT by
dinodino
To: Rumplemeyer
It’s possible to believe in Jesus without believing the Shroud is authentic. A former pastor of mine thought that Jesus didn’t look like that (Judas had to kiss him in order for the Romans to know who he was).
34 thousand billion watts? You would think the cloth would catch fire, no?
To: Rumplemeyer
Not to nitpick, but that does not agree with scripture. Thomas disbelieved until he actually touched the wounds on the body of the risen Christ. Only then did he believe completely.
17 posted on
04/06/2019 6:49:18 PM PDT by
Kirkwood
(Zombie Hunter)
To: Rumplemeyer; coaster123; MrEdd; dinodino; scrabblehack; Kirkwood
If proof were sufficient, wouldn't that mean faith would no longer be needed? But... Hebrews 11:6 says,
"Without faith it is impossible to please God." After all, "the demons believe, but merely shudder." --James 2:19
29 posted on
04/06/2019 10:21:30 PM PDT by
rx
(Truth Will Out!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson