ONE person makes ONE COMMENT and that supposedly destroys all of Vatican II?? This is called "anecdotal data" in the sciences and means virtually nothing. What did the other participants think?? This is called "cherry-picking" the data to match your prejudices.
And as I mentioned previously, the larger number of predator priests in the report were definitely NOT "rotten fruits of Vatican II". Their "roots" are elsewhere.
The comment is actually based more on observations of fact as one examines the attacks on Catholic doctrine, attacks established at the council, more than on one man’s comment. His comment is merely a significant red flag.
If you explore Novus Ordo Watch website you will quickly discover that V2 opened wide the doors to evil including invalidation of ordinations and consecrations (let alone embracing modernism, which is a rebellion against Saint Pope Pius X’s direction and teaching regarding the same. Just read Pope Pius X’s writings on the topic then start reading the documents of V2 and you will soon see two opposite doctrine being conveyed!)
When men who are thought to be but are NOT actual priests they lack the grace to prevail in such a vocation. Also the evils of V2 made more and more men who lacked qualifications to be attracted to the “vocation”.
Here is another helpful viewpoint on the culpability of V2:
A sedevacantist blogger comments on the relationship between ‘perversion and Modernism’:
“...This post will demonstrate the link between Modernism and rampant sexual perversion in the Vatican II sect. It will be shown how (a) Christ condemns homosexuality, (b) the Magisterium condemns it, and the Vatican II sect then changes course, leading to perversion’s acceptance in society with devastating consequences...”
https://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/2018/09/perversion-and-modernism.html