Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: daniel1212
As I maintained, and you support, here is the qualifier for all:

. . . with the successor of Peter . . . (my bolding for emphasis)

46 posted on 09/02/2018 10:30:28 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: imardmd1
As I maintained, and you support, here is the qualifier for all: . . . with the successor of Peter . . . (my bolding for emphasis)

But not above him, while the pope does not the bishops to ratify the veracity and authority of what he said "from the chair."

Yet RCs charge us with presuming to be "little popes," though instead of presuming ensured infallibility, our veracity must rest upon the weight of evidential warrant.

However, note that only the very declaration of an infallible statement is considered to be protected from error, and not the arguments or reasoning enlisted in support of it (and despite the lack thereof).

Nor are infallible statements considered to be wholly inspired of God as Scripture is, or as providing new public revelation, and thus they cannot be equal with Scripture, or all the oral wholly inspired statements and new revelation of men such as the apostles. "

47 posted on 09/02/2018 1:00:42 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson