Posted on 08/02/2018 4:43:06 AM PDT by piusv
I can now release the overall results of the facial recognition tests that have been performed using the most up to date technology available analyzed by the most sophisticated software technicians and organized and analyzed by an expert investigator.
"The only thing similar was the habit" were the words I just heard from the investigator in our phone conversation about the result. More specifics on the technicalities of the result will follow this initial announcement.
On advice, I will not yet reveal the names of the investigators, the names of the companies involved, or the names of the programs being used. They are the best. They are all working on a comprehensive and definite report on the results and this will be released in the coming weeks. I want to avoid any interference in the investigation. After the final facial recognition report is complete, the second phase of the investigation will be launched which will be finding out the identity of the Imposter and finding out what happened to our dear Sister Lucy dos Santos.
More soon.
Seriously, you could tell they weren’t the same. The real question was always: what happened to the real child of Fatima?
Do Paul VI next
Ummm, the teeth? I don’t think any other study is needed. Those are so far off it is painfully obvious.
Aside from the dentures, nothing looks suspicious to me.
???
Have you read any of her books? They ring true.
Sort of deadpan sarcasm, right? Tone is difficult to convey sometimes on the internet. Other than both being human, there is no similarity between the two. This took research to determine?
Somebody has some ‘splainin’ to do.
Yes, and this report does not ring true. No one makes a significant historical, spiritual and cultural announcement in this superficial tone and sensationalistic language, with no details, holding back the authors, researchers, etc. These are some anti-modernist types pulling a stunt.
You don’t read do you? He said he will be releasing these things in the coming weeks. You’re too busy jumping to conclusions.
Yes, we read, do you? My statement was he did not give all that pertinent info with the momentous announcement, as would be customary and professional. Who is racing ahead jumping to conclusions?
You'll get the info you so require....but you still won't believe it, will you?
Why wouldn’t I believe anything I read that’s reasonable, logical and substantiated? This, as yet, is not. I’m not sure why you suddenly think I must prove my analytic skills to yourself. I don’t react unthinkingly with hysterical enthusiasm to something JUST because it’s “traditional.” I challenge you to slow down your temper and engage reason.
Oh please. You were the one who started this by judging the man as “some anti-modernist type pulling a stunt”.
I challenge you to slow down your judgment and engage patience. That is if you truly are open to the possibility that this report is in fact true...
So far you give me no reason to believe that you are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.