Posted on 01/04/2018 6:53:40 PM PST by drrickjohn
Religious Liberty Is Eroding in Canada. Heres What Americans Should Learn.
Outside of watching the occasional hockey game or purchase of maple syrup, most Americans pay little attention to Canada.
We may know of Prime Minister Justin Trudeaus colorful socks, but little of how unpopular he is among his constituency. We may discuss the single-payer health care system, but are unfamiliar with the governments disrespect for religious liberty of our neighbors to the north.
Faithful patriots in this country who are concerned by the attacks on free exercise of religion in America should also be concerned by the similar attacks on liberty echoing within Canada, a country with strong protections for religious liberty in its Charter for Rights and Freedom.
In light of the immense trade between our two countries, we must determine if religious intolerance is an intangible export that has escaped our notice.
Americans need an alternative to the mainstream media. But this can't be done alone. Find out more >>
Last month, Albertas Child and Family Services barred a Christian couple from adopting a child because their religious views about sexualityviews shared by orthodox Jews and Muslimswere incompatible with the official position of the Alberta government.
The Ministry of Childrens Services stated that the couples belief that sexuality should not be experienced or explored until a person is married, would not create a safe, healthy, loving, and inclusive home.
And in June, Ontario passed a law that gave state agencies the power to prevent families from adopting or fostering children if the parents would not affirm the child transitioning their gender identity from male to female or vice-versa, calling such a denial child abuse.
Similarly, the American Civil Liberties Union is suing the state of Michigan over legislation that allows faith-based adoption agencies to only place children into homes with mothers and fathers while under government contract.
And much like Ontario, Illinois is requiring foster parents to affirm the gender identity of any child in their care and aid in any medical procedures the child wishes to undergo.
The Canadian government has unilaterally taken positions on sexuality without the consent of its citizenry, much like the Obama administrations unilateral decision to reinterpret the definition of sex to include sexual orientation and gender identity in Title IX.
But if Americans and Canadians cant adopt or foster children because they dont affirm a child undergoing potentially harmful hormone therapies and sex-reassignment surgeries or sexual activity outside of marriage, will the government also begin using this criteria for good parenting of biological children?
Will they treat the parenting practices of Orthodox Christians, Jews, and Muslims as suspect if they simply refuse to adopt the latest sexual trends?
Also in Canada, the Supreme Court will soon determine if attorneys who hold orthodox religious beliefs on sexuality are eligible to practice law.
Before Trinity Western University could even open its law school, the accrediting legal societies within Nova Scotia, Ontario, and British Columbia voted not to accredit graduates from the universitys school of law, because the Christian university has Orthodox Christian beliefs about marriage and sexuality.
Trinity Western University is the only Canadian university to have received an A+ grade in quality of education over the past seven years, yet in 2014, the Law Society of Upper Canada labeled the students views as abhorrent and not welcome in the public marketplace.
Without a degree from an accredited law school, students cannot practice law in the province.
Similarly, in 2015, the mayor of Salem, Massachusetts, lambasted Gordon College, a Christian university, for its beliefs about marriage after the university president wrote to President Barack Obama asking for a religious exemption from a forthcoming executive order on hiring practices related to sexual orientation and gender identity.
The mayor decided to prohibit Gordon College and its students from using a local meeting hall they had used for years. Lynn Public Schools then banned Gordon College students who were majoring in education from training as student teachers at local public schools.
The New England Association of Schools and Colleges even held a special meeting to consider revoking Gordons accreditation.
In both the United States and Canada, governments and accreditors are threatening the ability of graduates of Christian universities to work in the professions for which they have been trained.
Canadian members of parliament also denied member Rachael Harder the chance to chair the Status of Women Committee led by the Liberal Party solely because of her pro-life views. Despite the chair position being procedural, not political in nature, the Trudeau government refused to allow Harders outrageous views into any kind of position of authority.
Much like a scene from Mean Girls, politicians staged a walkout to protest Harders appointment because of her viewpoint on abortion. Ultimately, they gave the position to a member of parliament who did not want it.
In the United States, senators, including Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.; Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.; and Al Franken, D-Minn., and leftist organizations like the American Bar Association have smeared judicial nominees like Judges Amy Barrett and Steve Grasz and public officials like Kelvin Cochran and Russell Vought as unqualified and hateful, simply because of their Christian beliefs.
Their ability to serve as judges, work in government, or lead a fire department is being questioned solely because of their religious views.
In both the United States and Canada, the ability to work in government and pursue your dreams is becoming increasingly dependent on ones beliefs about sexuality, biology, and the beginning of human life.
These developments should concern all those who believe in the right to not only hold religious beliefs in private, but to exercise them in public.
Canada was founded on the idea of religious pluralism, allowing Catholics living in Quebec to freely practice their faith. The United States was founded as a refuge for religious dissenters, as the Puritans fled persecution from the Church of England.
It is this commitment to religious liberty for all that has led America to defend religious minorities around the world, including Jews, Muslims, Bahais, Buddhists, and Zoroastrians.
The U.S. and Canada were the only two countries that had ambassadors for international religious freedom. But Trudeau opted to dissolve Canadas office of ambassador of religious freedom.
If America and Canada, who are traditionally the foremost defenders of religious freedom around the world, are now forsaking that value, what will happen to the Rohingya Muslims in Burma, the Christians and Yazidis facing genocide by ISIS, and the Jews who are facing renewed anti-Semitism in Europe, all of whom the U.S. has fervently advocated for?
Right now, Canadians and Americans of faith have the opportunity to form strategic alliances, especially as they relate to marriage, family, and the free exercise of religion. But the growing threats to religious liberty and freedom of conscience make it especially urgent that these partnerships develop quickly.
Many of the worlds most dire and violent religious conflicts are rooted in lack of respect for religious freedom and religious diversity. There is no time to waste.
It is difficult for me to reconcile the difference between the Canadians I have personally met with what their country has become.
In the Winter of 1989, I was hired by a professor to interview people who were vacationing at the Gulf Islands National Seashore. The interviews were pretty short and only for the purpose of determining if they would be willing to take a much longer interview later by mail.
It turned out that just about every camper, and there were a lot, were Canadians. They were just about all older married couples.
They were invariably friendly and I think every single one agreed to take the interviews. I would visit with them for a while and just about every one, in fact I think every one of the men were veterans of WWII.
After finishing the project I had found those Canadians to be unusually fine people and basically conservative.
They couldn’t possibly be representative of all Canadians tho.
When you chase God out of the classroom you sure don’t usher in The Age of Reason. As Teddy Roosevelt once observed “If you educate the mind and not the morals you’re educating a menace to society’’.
No words, other than I’m glad I’m Texan.
There are two types of Canadians: Urban lunatic lefty types from big cities, and everyone else. You met people who are part of the latter category.
Item number seven in the Frankfurt School 11 Point Plan for Cultural subversion....” Emptying of Churches”...Trudeau is a Marxist as was Obama...Thank you God for Donald Trump. We may still have a chance.
Meh. Michigan has the best maple syrup.
I couldnt agree more with one caveat
Id add university towns to the collection of big cities (although admittedly, most universities are also located in big cities). Im sure weve all seen the county by country U.S. red and blue map from the last election
a riding by riding map drawn up for Canada has strong similarities with the exception that there are three parties instead of two. If one is to lump the Liberal Party and the New Democratic Party together, one can quickly see that the rural areas are strongly conservative while the cities are far left liberal. This was also the strong reality for the 2014 provincial election
.. take a look at this map. The Liberals won a smattering of ridings in Ottawa, London, Kingston and Kitchener-Waterloo but the bulk of their ridings were in Toronto and surrounding area. The rest of Southern Ontario basically all went to the Conservatives. http://www.cbc.ca/elections/ontariovotes2014/features/view/riding-finder For those who dont know, Canada uses red for Liberals, blue for Conservatives and orange for the New Democratic Party.
And who knows, maybe just maybe, Canada could end up discovering its version of DJT.
Yes, destroy religion. And another toxic tenent of the Frankfurt School: Destroy the authority of men.(aka Anglo-Saxon, heterosexual Christian men.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.