*#%#@ %(#@)@ %(@)@ @#(* #*(%)#% %I#)$)#
Okay..thanks now that I got that out of my system.
How does removal of the mandate affect this?
Thomas Jefferson:
“Nothing in the Constitution has given them [the federal judges] a right to decide for the Executive, more than to the Executive to decide for them. . . . The opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves, in their own sphere of action, but for the Legislature and Executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a despotic branch.” (Letter to Abigail Adams, September 11, 1804)
“Our Constitution . . . intending to establish three departments, co-ordinate and independent that they might check and balance one another, it has given—according to this opinion to one of them alone the right to prescribe rules for the government of others; and to that one, too, which is unelected by and independent of the nation. . . . The Constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please.” (Letter to Judge Spencer Roane, Sept. 6, 1819)
“You seem . . . to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so . . . and their power [is] the more dangerous, as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots.” (Letter to William Jarvis, Sept. 28, 1820)
Abraham Lincoln:
“…The candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the government, upon vital questions, affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made, in ordinary litigation between parties, in personal actions, the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having, to that extent, practically resigned their government into the hands of that eminent tribunal.”
This lunatic does not have the final say here. Judges have no authority to MAKE laws.
that’s an awful lot of @ words!
Well, there is a simple solution.
The Congress has the authority to change the law to something sane. Or the Congress has the power to remake the Federal Court system however they like. They can close entire courts, create new ones and they can eliminate any court system except the Supreme Court. (Hear that 9th Circus?)
That does not mean they will do it, but they have that power.
There is one other path. That of Convention of States for specific legislation.
I never said it was an easy path, but it is written into the constitution as the Law of the Land.
Okay judge, I’ll just fire all the women that work for our company and not ever hire any more. Problem solved. /sarc
What about the individuals responsibility to keep her damn legs closd if she doesn want to get pregnant?
Buy your own stupid birth control women. You want us out of your bedroom, stay the fuch out of our walets.
Judge Wendy Beetlestone is a Barack Obama appointee and a hater of pro-life individuals. That was why she appealed to Barack Obama who has the same feelings.
As a student of history I have read all the founding fathers biographies. Something that has always stuck with me was James Madison explaining why the second amendment was included and deemed incredibly important and paramount to the new republic. I am paraphrasing as the exact quote escapes me—he said that the people must be allowed to be armed so in the event that an out of control Judiciary starts making laws and decrees that are clearly wrong, the people have the ability to overthrow the tyrannical government. I wish I could find the exact quote-—but this kind of “judgement” is exactly what he was referring to-—a tyrannical out of control judiciary. Some smart Freeper may know the quote—
The SC will uphold Trump.
Is it too late to “abort” this judge?
Will the SCOTUS “contracept” her pernicious ruling?
Or, should POTUS just ignore this used ass-wipe and personally tell her to GFY?
.
No judge has that power!
The best way to deal with mentally incompetent jurists is to either ignore them, or to send the US Marshals to deliver them into proper custody.
.