Both he and Martin are card-carrying members of the "Lavender Mafia". His impulsive defense of Martin is entirely predictable.
I always here the religious apologists for secular humanist views on sexual mores use the passages where Yeshua encountered a prostitute, had compassion for her and did not condemn her. They ignore the last part, where Yeshua said - go and sin no more.
A. Yeshua accepted and had compassion for her.
B. Yeshua did not accept her sin and told her to sin no more.
“Tolerance and compassion” ARE NOT “acceptance”.
The secular humanist invaders of the churches have it wrong.
I wish writers would read what they have written before they publish. He either started with one thought and finished with another or he is unfamiliar with the conjugation of "to be."
bkmk