Martin is obviously not an atypical Jesuit in Francischurch.
1 posted on
09/17/2017 2:28:31 PM PDT by
ebb tide
To: dp0622
2 posted on
09/17/2017 2:45:37 PM PDT by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
To: ebb tide
It would be interesting to know what the book recommends.
Love the sinner, hate the sin.
3 posted on
09/17/2017 3:04:45 PM PDT by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: ebb tide
One would think the infiltration of the queers into the priesthood would have taught a lesson to the church. How short their memories.
4 posted on
09/17/2017 3:14:35 PM PDT by
Neoliberalnot
(Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed)
To: ebb tide
6 posted on
09/17/2017 3:21:01 PM PDT by
montag813
(ue)
To: ebb tide
The only “relationship” that real Catholics (real *Christians*,actually) want with “LGBT” is to clearly,and repeatedly,remind them that their lives feature grievously sinful acts and a life of no sex is,it would seem,the only moral path open to them.
To: ebb tide
“This society [Jesuits] has been a greater calamity to mankind than the French Revolution, or Napoleon’s despotism or ideology. It has obstructed the progress of reformation and the improvement of the human mind in society much longer and more fatally.”
{Letter to Thomas Jefferson, November 4, 1816. Adams wrote an anonymous 4 volume work on the destructive history of the Jesuits}
10 posted on
09/17/2017 4:18:00 PM PDT by
HLPhat
("TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS" -- Government with any other purpose is not American.)
To: ebb tide
It troubles me deeply that the very reverend John Cecero would put his name in favor of father James Martin’s book.
The work is a piece of trash and should not be condoned, especially given what homosexuals have done to the church with the abuse of young boys. Please reconsider!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson