Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/17/2017 7:40:46 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marshmallow
If lawyers can have “confidentiality” privileges so can priests.
2 posted on 08/17/2017 7:58:02 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (ObamaCare Works For Those Who Don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow
“I believe that this is an absolutely sacrosanct communication of the highest order,”

He is absolutely correct here. The seal of the confessional is sacrosanct.

3 posted on 08/17/2017 7:58:19 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow
Also,how can it be proven that the priest knew the identity of the confessor? A priest can truthfully testify that he didn't know who was confessing to a particular sin and also that he wouldn't recognize the voice either.
4 posted on 08/17/2017 8:01:06 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (ObamaCare Works For Those Who Don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow

Any priest that isn’t should have his faculties removed, be “laicized,” as it were.


7 posted on 08/17/2017 9:00:32 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson