There is no sensible arguments about a small-time priest, barely out of the seminary, that thought he was an authority on the Catholic Church. Luther was a little-known Catholic priest, with no authority whatsoever to question anything. It was his whacky followers that tore Christianity apart.
I had to re-read your post 2-3 times. I thought you were talking about Francis.
Luther did not tear Christianity apart. It was Catholicism.
There is no sensible arguments about a small-time priest, barely out of the seminary, that thought he was an authority on the Catholic Church. Luther was a little-known Catholic priest, with no authority whatsoever to question anything. It was his whacky followers that tore Christianity apart.
***
One: He is DOCTOR Luther. That means that he had PLENTY of seminary experience and beyond. Certainly a lot more than you.
Two: Ad hominem attacks, not only on Dr. Luther, but also on me. Is that the best you have? Is that ALL you have?
Three: You just broke the religion forum rules with your post. And FR rules on top of that.
... and the obscenely corrupt and violent Popes plus assorted miscreants in the hierarchy skate blameless with apologists for Rome again. Same as it ever was.