Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three Reasons That Argumentation Is So Difficult Today
Archdiocese of Washington ^ | 05-11-17 | Msgr. Charles Pope

Posted on 05/12/2017 7:10:58 AM PDT by Salvation

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-227 next last
To: ADSUM

Satan has your mind so bound that you post the scriptures and hear something Paul did not write! In your lost state, I am not even surprised. You hear not the still small voice, but you hear what you want to hear, to support the pride-in-self-striving your belief is based in.


181 posted on 05/13/2017 10:47:16 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Catholicism has substituted saints for specific gods, pagan worship for real worship.


Wherever did you get this idea?


182 posted on 05/13/2017 11:07:48 AM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
Even the simplest atatement BY JESUS must be twisted in catholiciism, to mean something other than what JESUS said. Here's a prime example, as posted by metmom: John 5:24 Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life. He does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life. ... What is eternal life? Is it eternal life if you can be duped by Satan into losing it? The Catholic avoids even the TRUTH and turns instead to their fidelity to the eucharist, as if their loyalty to keep sacrificing JESUS can re-up their lost eternal life. It smacks of 'never been there, got no tee shirt to show.'

The priest in catholiciism cannot afford to see the duplicity and contradictions in their religion else they would leave and be born from above, instead of leading people along satans 'striving for salvation' broad road to oblivion for rejecting the True Grace of God in Christ. I eternal life stops somewhere, it was not eternal to start with! But reading what JESUS said is the simple solution to the conundrum!

183 posted on 05/13/2017 11:27:12 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: ADSUM
Are you yet so dull? ... 68Simon Peter answered him, “Master, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. 69We have come to believe and are convinced that you are the Holy One of God.” Peter didn't say 'you have the flesh and blood we need to eat', he didn't even say 'you have the bread and wine we need. HE SAID 'You have the words of eternal life!'

Look at what twists your religion puts on the simple words of JESUS, so that they can keep you trusting in your devotion to their priestly ritual to have Eternal Life ... you are continuously promoting demonic blasphemy so you can feel you have a stake in obtaining eternal life, by mumbo jumbo, sacramental fealty! THAT IS A DEMONIC LIE. Jesus told you what work you must do to have eternal life, but you prefer to rely on your fealty to ritual rather than do what JESUS said: John 6:28 They (the catholics who want to rely on their work to obtain eternal life) said therefore unto him, ‘What may we do that we may work the works of God?’ 29 Jesus answered and said to them, ‘This is the work of God, that ye may believe in him whom He did send.’

You are shown but do not see, you are told but do not hear.

184 posted on 05/13/2017 11:47:14 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1
The Law was still in effect--not yet fulfilled by Him ("tetelestai!")--so the Law forbad them to literally drink blood or literally eat human flesh.

A critical point that Catholics HAVE to overlook in order to justify their interpretation of the Last Supper.

And Jesus said this about the Law.

Matthew 5:17-20 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished.

Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

185 posted on 05/13/2017 12:00:35 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Again, context would solve this problem for the Catholic.
186 posted on 05/13/2017 12:06:01 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: ADSUM

There’s not one Scripture that tells us that Peter was put in charge of the disciples by Jesus.


187 posted on 05/13/2017 12:10:44 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: ADSUM
The Apostles understood and accepted the words of Jesus because He was God. Others who did not believe left and went their own way.

For context:

60Therefore many of His disciples, when they heard this said, “This is a difficult statement; who can listen to it?” 61But Jesus, conscious that His disciples grumbled at this, said to them, “Does this cause you to stumble? 62“What then if you see the Son of Man ascending to where He was before?

63“It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing; the words that I have spoken to you are spirit and are life.

64“But there are some of you who do not believe.” For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were who did not believe, and who it was that would betray Him. 65And He was saying, “For this reason I have said to you, that no one can come to Me unless it has been granted him from the Father.”

66As a result of this many of His disciples withdrew and were not walking with Him anymore.

67So Jesus said to the twelve, “You do not want to go away also, do you?” 68Simon Peter answered Him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have words of eternal life. 69“We have believed and have come to know that You are the Holy One of God.” 70Jesus answered them, “Did I Myself not choose you, the twelve, and yet one of you is a devil?” 71Now He meant Judas the son of Simon Iscariot, for he, one of the twelve, was going to betray Him. John 6:60-71 NASB

188 posted on 05/13/2017 12:22:26 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: ADSUM
Ye of little Faith in the words of Jesus and complete lack of understanding.

I read English and have a working knowlege of the Greek. I know from reading the words inscripturated by the Holy Spirit what He is saying that my Master Jesus said, and keeps on saying. And I know the difference between figurative and literal speech modes and how they are to be applied.

You presume too much. Your apparent inability to grasp the meaning in context, when it is so plain, is baffling. Did you read at all what Msg. Pope said in the article above?

May you begin to understand instead of profaning the word of God.

The meaning of the Last Supper is not foolish, as it seems to be for you, making the elements of the Remembrance Supper into something they are not and cannot be. The meaning and purpose of the memorial is spiritually discerned, and without the guidance of the Holy Spirit one only has a wooden interpretation, of the sort you've offered.

It is clear that I can't help you, and your advisors are holding you back from confronting Bible truths. Do you understand the meaning of Matthew 13:10-15?

189 posted on 05/13/2017 12:22:38 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Excellent point, MM. I’ll remember it. Thanks for the discerning application of this nugget of truth.


190 posted on 05/13/2017 12:38:51 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: rwa265

“Catholicism has substituted saints for specific gods, pagan worship for real worship. Wherever did you get this idea?

One of your “Cardinals” quoted upthread - and of course history.


191 posted on 05/13/2017 12:43:34 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

“Again, context would solve this problem for the Catholic. “

Aren’t you assuming an objective audience that seeks truth??

I suggest you review the thread. That audience is not present yet.


192 posted on 05/13/2017 12:47:50 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

You would be correct...sad to say though.


193 posted on 05/13/2017 1:10:24 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
Thjs context from 2 Thessalonians is excellent, and thank you for citing it. It certainly illustrates my initial contention, that the Apostle Paul directed his disciples toward three "sources" (his written words, his spoken words, and his example/practice)--- which are really one source -- for their doctrine and practice.

2 Thessalonians 2:15
Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.

194 posted on 05/13/2017 2:04:16 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("I praise you for holding to the traditions just as I passed them on to you." - 1 Cor 11:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
Thjs context from 2 Thessalonians is excellent, and thank you for citing it. It certainly illustrates my initial contention, that the Apostle Paul directed his disciples toward three "sources" (his written words, his spoken words, and his example/practice)--- which are really one source -- for their doctrine and practice.

Yet we only have the written words of Paul.

And the context of 2 Thess gives us a good idea of what those traditions were. And they are nothing we see the Catholic claim today.

195 posted on 05/13/2017 2:05:57 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Obviously there is a difference in the Faith of the Apostles and members of the Body of Christ and the faith of (30,000) protest churches that believe their own doctrines.

Some claim faith in Jesus as God, but then go their own way and only accept some of His teachings.


196 posted on 05/13/2017 2:15:25 PM PDT by ADSUM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: ADSUM
Obviously there is a difference in the Faith of the Apostles and members of the Body of Christ and the faith of (30,000) protest churches that believe their own doctrines.

You continue to lose credibility by posting this routinely debunked claim of 30,000 protest churches.

A more accurate statement is there is a difference in the beliefs of the RCC and what is revealed in Scripture as has been shown in this, and many other threads.

197 posted on 05/13/2017 2:20:59 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: ADSUM

This is why I have stopped debating with these “super Christians” because it is a waste of time.


198 posted on 05/13/2017 2:38:54 PM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism5" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Good thing Paul didn’t have your mindset.


199 posted on 05/13/2017 2:48:27 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Claud
You are not quite grasping the argument here. How the Reformers cited the Fathers is the issue.

You are not quite grasping the argument here.

    "Substantiation for this understanding of the gospel came principally from the Scriptures, but whenever they could, the reformers also quoted the fathers of the catholic church. There was more to quote than their Roman opponents found comfortable" (Pelikan 48-49).

200 posted on 05/13/2017 4:07:31 PM PDT by boatbums (Authority has a way of descending to certitude, and certitude begets hubris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-227 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson