This is a caucus thread. Per religion forum guideliens, only members of the Orthodox Church may comment. Your respect for this limitation is appreciated.
1 posted on
03/18/2017 11:14:07 AM PDT by
NRx
To: Religion Moderator
After looking at this more closely, I have reluctantly come to the conclusion that there are enough references to other religions in here that I can’t justify the caucus thread designation. Feel free to remove it and my original comment.
2 posted on
03/18/2017 11:20:05 AM PDT by
NRx
(A man of integrity passes his father's civilization to his son, without selling it off to strangers.)
To: NRx
The problem is not “Fundamentalism.” The problem is legalism. One of the fundamentals of Christianity is “Love” and many Christians have abandoned it in favor of judgementalism and legalism.
Remember, Jesus came to save, not to judge.
To: NRx
It’s hard to believe that wars were fought and many people died over the argument whether Mary is the “Mother of God” or “Mary is the Mother of Christ.”
To: NRx
The Lord bless thee, and keep thee:
The Lord make his face shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee:
The Lord lift up his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace. (Numbers 6:24-26)
Some people talk WAY past their point.
If they ever had one.
5 posted on
03/18/2017 11:38:01 AM PDT by
alloysteel
(John Galt has chosen to take the job. This time, Atlas did NOT shrug.)
To: NRx
I am not a member of an “orthodox” caucus, but I have read this article through and thoroughly. Thank you for the work that has gone into posting it.
6 posted on
03/18/2017 12:10:29 PM PDT by
imardmd1
(Fiat Lux)
To: NRx
I just listened to their debate on AFR. I'm pretty familiar with Fr. John's thinking, but am still trying to understand what G.D. is trying to say -- assuming it's something more profound than "traditionalists are stupid." I gather from him that "Fundamentalism" has acquired a pan-religious definition among modern academics, which I find interesting. So Fr. John's complaint that it lumps together traditionalist Orthodox and the Ayatollahs may be justified. G.D. began and ended with the idea that Fundamentalists have created their own heresy in the Church, but I'm unclear yet to what he specifically refers. I'll need to follow more of the links to figure out what's being said.
(And, if Christian Fundamentalists create heresies, does he believe -- or is it academic consensus -- that Islamic Fundamentalists do the same? So "ISIS is not Islam"?)
8 posted on
03/18/2017 3:05:08 PM PDT by
LimitedPowers
(Citizenship is not a Hate Crime!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson