Posted on 02/08/2017 5:39:00 PM PST by Morgana
One abortionist is revealing his abortion religion and one New York Times writer couldnt get enough of it.
In a piece published Wednesday, New York Times Magazine columnist Ana Marie Cox interviewed Willie J. Parker, a Mississippi abortionist and former Planned Parenthood medical director, on his upcoming Lifes Work memoir. During the interview, Parker pointed to his faith as the reason he performs abortions. And while abortion is life-ending, he added, it isnt killing a person just a human entity.
From the very beginning, Cox hyped that Parkers book is rooted by his moral and spiritual argument in favor of abortion rights.
Before working in the abortion industry, Parker said he experienced a life-altering conversion that led him to believe that, as a Christian, he should perform abortions, instead of vice versa.
I needed to convert from a religious understanding that left me paralyzed to act on my deepest sense of connection to one that empowered me to do what I felt to be the right thing, he told Cox.
But, as Cox pointed out, Parker admits in his book that abortion is a life-ending process. Parker didnt deny it; but his definition of human life wasnt synonymous with a human person.
Life is a process, not an event, he argued, and so, A fetus is not a person; its a human entity. He added, If I thought I was killing a person, I wouldnt do abortions.
So, in the moral scheme of things, he said, I dont hold fetal life and the life of a woman equally. Both have value, he conceded, but I find myself unable to demote [a womans] aspirations because of the aspirations that someone else has for the fetus that shes carrying.
In their conversation, Cox also referenced Parkers verbicaine method during abortions where he tries to lighten the mood through conversation despite the narrative that makes abortion seem morbid and tragic. She also brought up Parkers love of football, a sport that he called larger than life. (Ending a life is OK. But a football game? Thats another question.)
Cox also asked Parker about his connection between your heritage as a descendant of slaves and the idea that abortion is ultimately about ownership of a body. (Well, thats true ownership of an unborn babys body, that is.)
Keep up with the latest pro-life news and information on Twitter.
I come from a heritage of people who know what its like to have your life controlled by somebody else, he responded. But, instead of the unborn, Parker meant women, because if you dont control your reproduction, you dont control anything else about your life.
But the biggest insult, he told Cox at another point, is the notion that theres such a thing as a black genocide, as if the people who care about abortion really care about black women and black babies.
In her last question, Cox lost all pretense as an unbiased interviewer. I cant help mentioning that youre not married, she said before asking, Is that a choice on your part? Because you seem pretty cool!
On that note, maybe its a blessing in disguise if The New York Times forgets about reviewing stories telling the truth about the horrors of the abortion industry.
This isnt the first time Parker has appeared in the pages of The Times. In 2015, the Opinion Pages published his piece, Why I Provide Abortions, where he insisted that abortion respond[s] to our patients needs and therefore expresses the deepest level of love that you can have for another person. He has also appeared in Cosmopolitan, where he compared a Planned Parenthood executive to Jesus before crucifixion.
“You’re doing it wrong.”
A pornographic level of nihilism.
A man not just disgusting, but ambitious about Being Disgusting.
This is a guy who has belonged to NOTHING in his whole life and so conjures up this garbage, hoping to demonstrate something —ANYTHING— at his core.
a complete fraud. Adult humans are “entities.” Everyone is an “entity.”
Maybe his rationale is that he thinks he is preventing more blood sucking atheist liberals from being born.../s
That’s not the right Christ.
Be very careful.
He will die in jail. What does he have to lose?
Oh, so many things things wrong, but among them, this:
‘But the biggest insult, he told Cox at another point, is the notion that theres such a thing as a black genocide, as if the people who care about abortion really care about black women and black babies.’
Hey, abortionist, I do care about the black women and the black babies...and the white women and the white babies, and the Latino women and the Latino babies, and the Asian women and the Asian babies, and the Native American women and the Native American babies, etc., etc., etc.
ALL OF THESE LIVES MATTER TO ME!!!
No he won''t. He hasn't been arrested for anything. You are perhaps thinking of Kermit Gosnell.
That's cutting it pretty thin. I would have to go with the more generally applicable, "Everybody's gotta die anyway, so what's the difference?"
... or at my age, you have the very understandable, "You've had your life. Don't complain."
But I always think of Clint Eastwood's declamation in THE UNFORGIVEN ... "It's a hell of a thing killin' a man. Take away all he's got, and all he's ever gonna have ..."
That last phrase led me into contemplation, as it would seem to include the prospects of a nascent life in the womb, namely its entire existence as a PERSON, and I don't see the futurity of this prospect as an excuse for, or a mitigation of the tragedy.
Very disordered soul.
That's the same argument the Nazis used against the Jews.
This doctor is a deceived pawn of Satan.
55 MILLION AMERICAN BABIES HAVE BEEN SLAUGHTERED SINCE 1973 and this monster is only continuing the American Holocaust of Infanticide to the glee of the liberal dimwits and the corrupt press.
I wouldn’t want to be in his shoes on Judgment Day. Unless he repents, he’ll see what Almighty God thinks about the importance of his “faith” to kill babies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.