All of the popes after Pius X are guilty of not doing enough or being too soft, but I would not label them Modernists and I certainly wouldn’t equate them with the likes of the flaming Modernist and manifest heretic Bergoglio.
And where is this proof that Benedict XV was a protege of a Freemason? You keep making accusations, but where is the evidence?
Pope (should be Saint) Pius XII say to the silencing of the execrable Modernist Teilhard de Chardin, SJ. That was during a papacy which saved (according to the State of Israel at the time of his death) about 900,000 Jews from the Holocaust.
Benedict XV (della Chiesa) spent World War I blubbering about peace in our time.
It is fair to call Bergoglio a manifest heretic when he does not think himself as pope qualified to judge sexual perverts or when he invents out of whole cloth environmentalist fantasies and expects his blatherings on same to be accepted as Magisterial or tries to facilitate the unworthy receipt of the Eucharist by the unrepentant perverts. While Modernism was called by Pope St. Pius X "the synthesis of all heresies," a number of those heresies are not exemplified by Bergoglio.
May God fire Bergoglio ASAP and replace him with a young, robust, healthy, thoroughly hard line and militantly CATHOLIC successor before he gets to pollute the College of Cardinals with equivalent supporters of his evil to those who conspired in his election.
It would be particularly helpful if a new Congregation for filling toilet paper dispensers be added to the Curia to require Blase Cupich to run without ever getting a red hat. Then Bishop Barron can be appointed to Chicago and get that red hat.