Posted on 08/19/2016 2:58:15 PM PDT by Morgana
True, but it’s good to know there is still legal recourse to head off nonsense like this.
Inasmuch as there is a fit between it and the Lord’s express purpose for citizens of the everlasting.
There’s always a situation where the more godly thing to do is cede — where it’s a matter of “oh, I just don’t like that kind of person.” But when it is a ministry of faith, this does not make sense.
Again, this is the sun shining, by which hay can be made. We should be grateful for it and make good use of it, in its season. It will not always be.
The next step will be to require you to use a trannie for the funeral of your loved one, whether you want them or not.
Note that there is NOTHING in Title VII that covers trannies. This is all created by the Obama administration and the Injustice Department out of whole cloth. Once he got a couple of leftist federal judges to go along, they then claimed that was the “law.”
So true.
I never ran into that in these last 50 years of family and friends deaths and burials. If there were homosexuals running a business they had the good sense to pretend during business hours.
Not a chance. I wouldn't trust them as far as I could throw them.
“If he’s now a “she,” he clearly isn’t the same person they hired. So, there is no case. Just refuse to hire the “woman.””
You have a point there. Pallbearers have always been men, and families will want this because if that coffin is dropped there will be hell to pay. She is now a woman and really can’t do that job, no matter what the feminists say. The customer is always right.
Noting a clear pronouncement of Scripture is not egotism, but impugning the reason for doing so surely is....
Then why didn't the Angels make that clear to Lot?
Another set up by the sexual sin community to try to force compliance and sue Christians.
I’m convinced that they hunt down those they know are committed Christians and get jobs with them for the sole purpose of litigation.
What kind of situation would you be envisioning with Lot? It does not at all sound parallel.
I should think it rather apparent.
Even so, can you think of a scriptural directive for the godly “ceding” to the wicked?
Humor me and spell it out, and I will point out how it is not parallel.
How about blessing your enemies?
This could not go to the point of “being unequally yoked with unbelievers” — however short of that, our directions from God are quite clear.
Then why should I bother if you've made that determination before even understanding it?
Nevertheless, I think the scriptural reference I asked for is still relevant to the discussion.
I just furnished it to you, bright head.
But it sounds like YOU have made that determination YOURSELF or else you would have thought at once about blessing your enemies.
Really? Define "blessing," and more importantly, show how "ceding" is in keeping with the directive.
Not at all. I'm not in the habit of using ambiguous terms to make a solid argument.
Mocking for Jesus?
And I'm not even an enemy....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.