[YogicCowboy]

Even when he is right, he is wrong.

Underlying his proposition is situational ethics, not absolute law.

Many young people who wed - of any era - do not really understand the implications of their vows. Yet the vow stands.

Does a failure to understand the oath in court invalidate one’s testimony? No.

When he appeared, all I needed to know was: A) A Jesuit; B) From Argentina; C) Chose Francis: A + B + C = Marxist.

[Ted Grant]

You could have stopped at “1. a Jesuit.” I was taught by Jesuits in high school. Perdictablly bad.

[goat granny]

all I needed to hear was “Jesuit”