1 posted on
05/25/2016 2:47:49 PM PDT by
ebb tide
To: ebb tide
What can one say, as quoted above, Muller does everything to deny the actual bodily Resurrection of Our Lord - and so does Ratzinger - which is why it is so important that given Bergoglio's over the top heresies, Catholics do not get sucked into this "good cop, bad cop" kabuki theater. The situation is confused and confounded enough already.
Muller also tries to make excuses for Bergoglio as below:
Vaticans Doctrinal Chief Cardinal Müller: Francis Not a Professional Theologian
A professional heretic holding hands with an unprofessional heretic
2 posted on
05/25/2016 8:26:16 PM PDT by
SGNA
Wow.
That makes Vatican II more essential and authoritative than Genesis. Since, you know, Genesis is just mythology.
3 posted on
05/25/2016 8:38:03 PM PDT by
Zionist Conspirator
(HaShem first! Anything else is idolatry, a violation of the very first commandment!)
To: ebb tide
But Cardinal Müller, whose insistence on the SSPX adhering to the Council's teaching is clearly more pronounced than that of the Holy Father, told Herder Korrespondenz that one cannot discount the Council as only pastoral chatter" just because it adopted no binding dogmas. Given Vatican II is supposed to be an ecumenical/general council of the Holy Catholic Church, this argument makes sense to me. Ecumenical/general councils are infallible:
Per the Catholic Encyclopedia, "All the arguments which go to prove the infallibility of the Church apply with their fullest force to the infallible authority of general councils in union with the pope.
The problem is, of course, that Vatican II/present "Magisterium" contradicts prior Magisterium.
4 posted on
05/26/2016 2:39:44 AM PDT by
piusv
(The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson