Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o
do you think betraying and abandoning Jesus was a doctrine of the NT Church?

No, but it made them better disciples and strengthened them for later trials (except for Judas). They repented and regretted their actions. There is a difference between a moment of weakness (with possible danger to themselves) and persistent actions over many many years of an institution which inflicted cruel tortures and death to who knows how many souls that believed different from them. Maybe you don't see the difference but I am sure God does.

20 posted on 05/20/2016 6:41:09 PM PDT by BipolarBob (I'm so open minded that you should only think like me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: BipolarBob
"and persistent actions over many many years of an institution which inflicted cruel tortures and death to who knows how many souls that believed different from them."

Protestants never seem to grasp the irony of harping on this point.

21 posted on 05/20/2016 6:49:49 PM PDT by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: BipolarBob

Betraying and abandoning Jesus made Peter, James, etc. better disciples? God forbid that anyone should do evil that good may come of it.

Sin is sin, whether in 60, 1600, or 2016 AD. Widespread sin, however, even in high places, does not turn sin into a doctrine of the Church.


22 posted on 05/20/2016 6:58:42 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("If you can't identify it, don't put it in your mouth."--- Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson