Posted on 04/30/2016 5:34:13 AM PDT by marshmallow
If I'd been a ticket holder I'd sued for breach of contract.
If this guy's attorney is smart he would be pursuing this line of argument.
I have noticed that even really good lawyers for conservatives can argue a case from the perspective of the homoFascists. This is a loosing strategy. They should undo the false narrative of the enemy and put to rights the real nature of the issue.
The marriage debate is no different. Attorneys try to argue for the "right for children to have a mother and father," but that's not the central issue at all, although enormously important. That issue springs from the ontology of marriage, what it IS in its substance.
The case transcripts are available for your review.
I haven’t seen any summaries suggesting ineffective representation.
I'm not impugning the competency of the defense in this particular case, but in general. The arguments used by the defendants in numerous marriage cases fell flat, because they were shooting at the wrong targets, even though they hit them.
>> the Constitution and the rule of law has become a thing of the past.
Per Romans chapter1, Nature eventually always overrules those who “thinking themselves wise, became fools”.
Good news for retired/unemployed N. Vietnamese Re-education Camp Commandants & Guards. Jobs await you in Colorado!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.